Several state governors — including our own — promote concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) as a rural economic development tool. But are they?
I set out to find an answer to a simple question. That simple question is: Are CAFOs economically beneficial?
The answer, I learned, is equally simple: No.
Realizing that I am entering an area that has traditionally been the stomping grounds of rural economists, I relied heavily on the studies of Bill Weida of Colorado College and John Ikerd of the University of Missouri. Both are rural economists and both are retired. Retirement has certain benefits. For one thing, it frees retirees from the dictates of the hierarchy at whatever institution employed them. The second benefit is that the retiree is freed up to work on the issues deemed important.
Both Weida and Ikerd have studied rural development and both have concluded that CAFOs do more harm than good to the rural economy.
For indicators, they cite:
n The increase in rural crime (burglaries, driveby shootings, drug deals).
n The decrease in property values on lands near CAFOs.
n The necessity (and increased cost) for local school districts to teach English as a Second Language.
n The necessity for local “C-Stores” to hire bilingual clerks.
n The closure of local retail outlets.
n That local banks and savings and loan institutions are purchased by larger entities or close altogether.
n That independent farmers go out of hog-rearing, dairy or chicken operations (and this has a “domino” effect).
n The amount of direct and indirect subsidies to CAFOs.
n The few local workers hired by CAFOs.
n The growing numbers of documented and undocumented immigrants as the work force.
n The burden on the local community to provide social services for a foreign population.
Any one of these indicators would be problematic, but when all of them are added together, it becomes readily apparent that CAFOs are an economic disaster for rural communities.
No doubt, a few on the boards of Tysons, Smithfield, and Seaboard benefit. No doubt, that CEOs of ConAgra and Cargill do well. But the folks on corporate agribusiness boards and the CEOs don’t live in rural communities. Indeed, Joe Luter, the CEO of Smithfield — a self-described “family farmer” — lives in a condo on Park Avenue in New York City.
So, while a few of the already-rich get richer, rural communities get poorer. While a few bigwigs vacation for months in Bermuda or a tropical island in the Pacific, rural residents can hardly afford to take a vacation at all.
Economic benefit? No. Economic development? No.
If this is, as some say, “the future of agriculture,” rural residents had better hang onto their pocketbooks and hope that the invasion of the CAFOs goes away.
So what are the governors thinking in promoting CAFOs as a way to benefit rural communities? While my first impulse is to state “They aren’t thinking,” the adage of “follow the money” applies. Take a look at which business organizations bankroll gubernatorial campaigns. Take a look at the donations flowing in from advocacy groups such as the Farm Bureau, the Pork Producers Association, the Poultry Federation, or the American Dairy Federation.
Who are the governors listening to? Those with the most money for them.
Ken Midkiff is a spokesman for the Sierra Club.
Opinion
Ken Midkiff, guest columnist: CAFOs a drain on economy
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






