We want to celebrate and call this a victory.
In reality, it’s a tragedy.
A Cole County circuit judge has upheld a lawsuit filed against the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. The court action overturns DNR’s approval of a concentrated animal feeding operation a stone’s throw away from the state historic site of Arrow Rock.
According to the conclusions of Judge Patricia S. Joyce, CAFOs now cannot be built within 15 miles of the Arrow Rock site — or any other state historic site or park, according to the interpretation of DNR Director Doyle Childers.
That means the number of future CAFOs could be severely limited in Southwest Missouri. A corporation would be hard-pressed to find enough suitable land far enough away from similar sites in Barry, Barton, Jasper, McDonald and Newton counties.
That sounds like a victory worthy of major celebration, considering the damaging environmental impacts CAFOs have.
But the decision only highlights the willful failure of the Department of Natural Resources to protect the state’s resources.
Arrow Rock falls directly under the purview and protection of DNR. Yet DNR easily granted a permit to a farm that would have housed 4,800 hogs only two miles from the village of Arrow Rock and the Sappington Cemetery. If it weren’t for the attention of people concerned about the environmental impact of the hog farm, it likely would have been built.
In other words, residents and the courts had to do DNR’s work for it.
Nothing better describes DNR’s failure than the attitude of its director: Childers refers to this as some of the worst “judicial activism” he has ever seen.
Ironic, considering Judge Joyce cited DNR’s injudicious inactivity within her conclusions. This case happened not because a judge wanted to change the law, but because Arrow Rock residents were tired of DNR not enforcing it strongly enough.
Make no mistake: Joyce’s decision is a major victory for anyone who appreciates the natural beauty of the Ozarks.
But the court’s decision demonstrates a tragedy of tremendous proportion, because it shows that residents cannot trust DNR to do its job.
Opinion
In our view: Residents, judge perform DNR’s duty
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


