The more we know about Missouri’s Proposition A, the more we feel like someone’s trying to deal us a bad hand.
Written and bankrolled by the casino industry, Proposition A has three components.
* It would remove Missouri’s $500 loss-limit. Missouri is the only state in that nation that puts a cap on the amount of money a gambler can lose in a two-hour “excursion.” Gamblers who reach the limit must wait until the next excursion before they can buy another $500 worth of chips.
* It increases the gaming tax that casinos pay by one percent. That means instead of paying 20 percent, Missouri casinos would pay 21 percent. Proponents of the measure say the initiative would bring in more than a $100 million a year in additional revenue for schools. Additional revenues are estimated based on the repeal of the loss limits and the supposition that the high-rollers wouldn’t bypass Missouri.
* Finally, the initiative caps the number of casinos in the state at 13, although voters could change that cap if they wanted.
We aren’t necessarily against removing the loss limits, but not through this vehicle that obviously is a contrivance to generate more money for the casinos while at the same time shutting down future competition.
As for the rewards for schools, we looked to Webb City R-7 Superintendent Ron Lankford, who says Proposition A is “about gambling, not about education,” he said.
In fact, the longtime superintendent told us that he resents groups using education as a carrot to entice people to vote for a measure.
“There is a hard sell to pass this initiative, and education tends to be an area that people are interested in, so they will vote yes on it because they think it will help the schools,” he said.
In the end, Lankford believes propositions like this jade the voters and eventually end up hurting local school districts.
“The initiative would grant casinos as monopoly in Missouri on the backs of education.”
Loss limits can be addressed by the Legislation, and free-market enterprise will bring in more revenues to the state.
We recommend voters reject this attempt by the casino industry to control the game.
Opinion
In Our View: Say ‘no deal'
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


