This letter is about the article by Greg Grisolano (Globe, Nov. 13) with regard to two Kansas students winning a national award for their film about concentrated animal-feeding operations.
The article is about two young Pittsburg State University men who won first place in Collegiate Broadcasters Inc., a national organization that recognizes student achievement in media. This award was won with a documentary they did about CAFOs, Roaring River, and the environment called “Everyone Lives Downstream.’’
Everyone living in this area should be proud of their achievement.
Online, under the comments section to this story, there are a couple of people who wrote in criticizing the documentary and myself for complimenting them in the article. One quote is about “the Riedel guy, who has put out volumes of misinformation before.’’ I am that Riedel guy. I have written articles concerning our water supply and all the impaired streams and rivers in Southwest Missouri. Volumes might be a slight exaggeration.
The two people with negative comments also talk about it being one-sided and that “a film that only shows one side of an issue isn’t a documentary.” These two people did not see the film or they would know better. The Department of Natural Resources and the Missouri Conservation Department are interviewed. As to the comment “they should have interviewed the people with the CAFO in Roaring River,” the owners were given an opportunity to participate, and they declined.
Do any of you readers out there think it is strange that we have two documentary experts in the area that can negatively critique a documentary without seeing it and yet a group of professionals who judge documentaries from all over the United States can give a first-place award to these Pittsburg State students?
Could it be they are concerned about the awareness this documentary is bringing to the public about CAFOs?
James Riedel
Eagle Rock
Opinion
Voices: Documentary criticism
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
-
Our View: Meaningless in Missouri
Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






