The Joplin School District’s five-year strategic plan was approved Tuesday night at the regular Board of Education meeting. In our view, it was an excellent start and those preparing the plan deserve great credit, particularly in the areas of graduation-rate improvement and long-range financial planning.
Simply stated, the long-range financial planning process proposed and approved is “cutting edge.”
The graduation-rate improvement plan also deserves high praise. One point on which we have a strong opinion is the plan’s approach to articulating, teaching and enforcing values with consistency. The plan addresses those needs head-on and we wholeheartedly support it. Other specific programs such as transition, mentoring, close liaison with juvenile authorities and detailed tracking of “at risk” students are on the mark.
However, the plan lacks depth, breadth and clarity for improving the academic performance of all students. The student-achievement plan is weak and, as noted in the work session, needs much more work and attention. Any high-school graduate today should have a strong, fundamental ability to read with understanding, write with passion and clarity, and be capable of working business and trade levels of mathematical problems. A head-on acknowledgment of that need should be clearly stated and plans put into place to dramatically improve student performance in those three areas.
When the rubber meets the road in education there are only two people “on the road.” They are the student and the teacher. The plan makes no attempt to address the need to improve teacher quality. That, in our view, is a fundamental shortfall that needs to be addressed in the coming months. Some teachers are “at risk” just like some students. Why not acknowledge that fact and start work on improvement?
Again, we believe this planning process is a great new start. It provides opportunity for continuing input from educators as well as the public. If you are interested in education, you should read the plan and provide your input. We believe the district will welcome your views.
Opinion
In our view: School plan a good start
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


