As protests and violence continue on the streets of Tehran over a recent election, American citizens have plenty of opinions about what the United States should do.
President Barack Obama has been pressured to act ever since Iranian citizens started a protest of a June 12 presidential election. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won that election in a landslide.
But we don’t think there’s much Obama or the United States can do.
Obama did steepen his talk on Tuesday against the Iranian government for imprisoning, beating and firing at protesters. He said “the world was appalled and outraged” by the violence and urged country leaders to allow free speech.
Future U.S. actions seem to depend largely on whether the elections were run badly.
Opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, Ahmadinejad’s challenger, has alleged voter fraud and called himself the true winner of the election. Mousavi has promised to publish election violations at a future time.
But Iran’s ruling clerics have made it clear that there won’t be another election.
If it was a legitimate election — and until proof surfaces otherwise, we have to assume it was — then the United States should respect who won.
In the future, perhaps the United Nations can serve as an election watchdog for worrisome countries such as Iran, which is allegedly pursuing a nuclear program. The U.N. is a good choice to ensure that votes are accurate and fairly counted.
Iran is a volatile nation. When it comes to the threat of nuclear power, the United States should be prepared to intervene. And, when it comes to condemning actions that prevent people from speaking freely, the United States is right to speak.
But we must respect the right of a country to hold its own elections and handle complaints of fraud. Because of that, there is nothing Obama should say.
Opinion
Youth view: U.S. actions over Iran are limited
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






