As protests and violence continue on the streets of Tehran over a recent election, American citizens have plenty of opinions about what the United States should do.
President Barack Obama has been pressured to act ever since Iranian citizens started a protest of a June 12 presidential election. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won that election in a landslide.
But we don’t think there’s much Obama or the United States can do.
Obama did steepen his talk on Tuesday against the Iranian government for imprisoning, beating and firing at protesters. He said “the world was appalled and outraged” by the violence and urged country leaders to allow free speech.
Future U.S. actions seem to depend largely on whether the elections were run badly.
Opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, Ahmadinejad’s challenger, has alleged voter fraud and called himself the true winner of the election. Mousavi has promised to publish election violations at a future time.
But Iran’s ruling clerics have made it clear that there won’t be another election.
If it was a legitimate election — and until proof surfaces otherwise, we have to assume it was — then the United States should respect who won.
In the future, perhaps the United Nations can serve as an election watchdog for worrisome countries such as Iran, which is allegedly pursuing a nuclear program. The U.N. is a good choice to ensure that votes are accurate and fairly counted.
Iran is a volatile nation. When it comes to the threat of nuclear power, the United States should be prepared to intervene. And, when it comes to condemning actions that prevent people from speaking freely, the United States is right to speak.
But we must respect the right of a country to hold its own elections and handle complaints of fraud. Because of that, there is nothing Obama should say.
Opinion
Youth view: U.S. actions over Iran are limited
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


