There is an interesting and important debate between two powerful figures in the Obama administration.
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano wants to use the National Guard to enforce security on our southern border. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates asks who will pay for the troops and who has command authority over them. This relates directly to the question of the role of our military forces in domestic law enforcement.
The noted author on matters military, Tom Clancy, once gave a speech arguing against the use of military forces for law enforcement. His subsequent book “Clear and Present Danger” emphasized his points. Simply stated he said, “Don’t do it.” We agree.
Governors have statutory authority to use the National Guard for short-term duty such as riot control. That is appropriate, and the state foots the bill in most cases. In the above case, the mission for the Guard is more open-ended (even undefined in terms of when the job would be completed), and Homeland Security wants the Department of Defense to foot the bill.
We strongly agree that border security in the south requires significant enhancement. That is the clear responsibility of the Department of Homeland Security. That department should hire and train the necessary forces to perform that mission and pay for the effort to do so.
If such security is an emergency matter requiring the short-term use of the Guard and its equipment, then Homeland Security should fund the effort. Command authority over the troops should rest with the military chain of command during the effort. This would allow time for Homeland Security to hire, train and equip its own forces for the longer mission.
Few military personnel are specifically trained in law enforcement domestically. Their mission is to fight wars, a job with entirely different skills.
Budget augmentation would obviously be required to increase border security. It is a domestic issue and should be funded accordingly. Let Homeland Security fight that budget battle in Congress. If the military funds it, fiscal accountability as well as mission success or failure accountability will be lost in the shuffle.
Gates needs to win in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. He must train, equip and fund the forces to do so. Napolitano needs to win on the border. She must carry the fiscal and tactical burden of success on her own two feet.
This is reminiscent of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld trying to blame the failure in Iraq on the State Department. Let’s not go down that road again.
Opinion
In our view: Safe border
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






