No more is Missouri in a curious group of four states. Last week, Gov. Jay Nixon informed the National Governors Association that Missouri would join an effort to develop a common core of educational standards for math and English.
We think signing on is a good move, but we hope that education officials don’t forget the reason they originally resisted. We also hope they see the next logical step.
Like Missouri, Alaska, South Carolina and Texas had not signed onto the nationwide effort. Missouri’s reason was pretty compelling: State board of education members feared that if Missouri signed on to develop common standards, then it wouldn’t be able to set its own standards higher.
We usually agree that states should have ultimate control of educational matters. But in this case, we support the state’s involvement. In the long run, such standards will help students. The real world is a global work force, and students shouldn’t be ill-prepared for it by growing up in a state with sub-par standards.
Nixon’s agreement is dependent upon the agreement of education commissioner Chris Wright Nicastro, who was announced Thursday as the new director of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and the state board.
The obvious next step is that Missouri should take another look at its testing system.
Part of the nationwide effort will be to develop and implement an assessment system to measure student performance. As much as we hate taking standardized tests, they are a way that an area’s progress and success can be measured on the same ruler.
But Missouri’s system —- the MAP tests — is ultimately designed to review a school district, not help a student.
We hope that better, student-focused tests are a result of nationwide effort. We also hope this leads to an emphasis on learning, not testing.
Opinion
Youth view: Learning with new standards
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






