“Marijuana is a gateway drug.”
“Marriage is between one man, one woman.”
“Bars, strip clubs, casinos and cigarette companies should pay higher taxes.”
All of the above are examples of “affirmative-action” statements. That is, they are statements that deal not with individual rights and justice, but instead, deal with society as a whole. The well-meaning misguided who make these statements are concerned with what is called “the greater good.”
And what is so wrong with that? After all, the Bible calls us to love our neighbors as ourselves and the Constitution speaks of the “general welfare.” Shouldn’t we, as good citizens, be concerned about our community? Of course.
The danger is when we begin to legislate ways to create the society we envision — Prohibition anyone? Walking an old lady across the street is admirable, but how many of us would point a gun at someone’s head and force him to take her hand?
Government “affirmative action” is that gun.
To further illustrate this point, it’s important to understand what government is. Government is force. It is nothing more than group of individuals with designated powers created to protect us from the school-yard bullies. More eloquently put, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
It follows that the only just usage of government (force) against our fellow man is a negative one; after an individual has infringed upon our natural rights. Using government as a positive and preemptive tool is not only dangerous, it’s wrong.
Government rightly only has the power to do what we as individuals already have the right to do.
Jessica Schreindl was Opinion Page editor for The Chart, Missouri Southern State University’s newspaper. Her blog, “Redheaded Politics” can be read on the Globe’s Web site, www.joplinglobe.com.
Opinion
Guest columnist: Danger exists in legislating society
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


