The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


August 19, 2013

Your View: Hidden agenda?

JOPLIN, Mo. — Upon seeing the initial headline regarding the Joplin City Council’s actions against City Manager Mark Rohr, my heart sank. I was afraid we were losing the best city manager I can ever remember.

However, it took only a few sentences into the article to see what was truly happening. It appears that some on the council certainly had an agenda, but little did they know that their actions and votes were public record ... uh-oh. Thank you, Joplin Globe.

It’s been quite amusing to see the mayor and the four council members who voted against Rohr backpedal since the Globe’s publication. The entire debacle smacks of unethical, manipulative behavior from a few. Since it became public, councilman Benjamin Rosenberg, who initiated the vote because he “did not like his (Rohr’s) management style,” is now ready to move forward and “make him the best city manager he can be.” Well, Mr. Rosenberg, Mark Rohr does not need you for that, nor does the city of Joplin need you if this is the way you conduct business.

 Mr. Scearce, to you I say, it appears you have too much time on your hands if it is spent contacting other states to find dirt on our master developer. Time, I might add, that could be well spent correcting your attitude and trying to work with the city manager and for the city of Joplin rather than against it.

 As for the mayor, I’m still in the dark as to why she denied repeated requests to have the city attorney present for the vote. Could the reason be so she could change her vote once outside of chambers and en route to the city manager’s office? Appears so.  

Lastly, why would you ask Mr. Rohr to resign when you have not spoken with him first about your areas of concern or recommendations for improvement; and most importantly, if you wanted rid of him, why then award him with a merit raise? That does not make sense and seems too coincidental that the timing comes right on the heels of the shake-up with the Public Works Department. We’ll see.

Mayor Colbert-Kean, Mr. Rosenberg, Mr. Scearce, Jack Golden and Trisha Raney, to each of you I would say, “Our character is what we do when we think no one is looking.”

Teresa Babcock


Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating