On behalf of women, children and men who seek protection in shelters across this nation because they are abused, we thank the U.S. House of Representatives for reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
On behalf of law enforcement departments across the country that rely on federal funding to help offset costs of investigating assaults and rapes, we applaud the decision made Thursday not to walk away without a victory. While violent crimes would still have been priority, something else would have taken a back seat without this important funding.
The law, passed in 1994, has been renewed twice before without controversy, but as in many things in Congress these days it was caught up in a partisan battle and allowed to lapse in 2011 even though the Senate easily reauthorized the bill. The House refused it because it was expanded to include lesbians, gays and Native American women. The law, as we see it, was expanded to protect more people than ever before. In our view, it should be expanded to include all.
Thursday’s 286-138 vote came after House lawmakers rejected a more limited approach offered by some Republicans. The Senate version, which passed with ease for the second time earlier this year, was then reintroduced in the House and passed.
We appreciate the efforts to keep this important law in the forefront of lawmakers. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., sponsor of the Senate bill, spoke rationally about the anti-violence bill that should never have become a political lightning rod.
“That is why I applaud moderate Republican voices in the House who stood up to their leadership to demand a vote on the Senate bill,” she told an Associated Press reporter.
We know that many things factor into votes, but the welfare and safety of citizens should never be determined by party platform.
Southwest Missouri’s Rep. Billy Long, R-Springfield, and Northeast Oklahoma’s Rep. Markwayne Mullin, R-Claremore, were among those voting against reauthorization.
Our thanks to Lynn Jenkins, R-Topeka, for adding your name to the “aye” list in your representation of Southeast Kansas.
Opinion
Our View: Protections for all
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



