I was delighted to read the letters from Clovis Steele about the history of the Memorial Hall, (Globe, Jan. 22) and Ronald Gentzler (Globe, Jan. 23). Mr. Gentzler was kind to call it goofy. I called it crazy.
Unfortunately, citizens opposing the idea were not present during the Joplin City Council meeting Jan. 19 about the proposal of taxes to fund the moving of the Joplin Museum Complex to Memorial Hall. Those who support the location to Memorial Hall brushed the City Council nicely. They were either driven by emotion to preserve the structure, emotional attachment to downtown or business people in downtown who think that if we have a museum there, we will have lines of buses filled with tourists.
Unfortunately, the City Council took the bait. It indicated that the building is not utilized enough and has a high maintenance cost. The city government is not in the entertainment business, and they need to lease the hall to an entity that is in the entertainment business and the city to get percentage from profit plus preserve the veterans’ access to the hall.
We all agree that we need a new location and space since the old museum ran out of space, and also we will need to raise money through the proposed tax for the project. In the meeting I proposed a new location and new building. My rationale will save Memorial Hall and if you are going to spend $7 million, you should not spend a chunk of it to remodel the inside of a building.
You need to spend it on a new modern structure that looks like a 21st-century museum, with a strong new structure and material that lasts forever. It should have easy accessibility and in a nice location, hopefully in the middle of a large parcel with a nice surrounding, landscaping and space for outdoor sculpture display and activity close to Interstate-44, where 53,000 cars pass by it daily.
The City Council needs to think outside or downtown, and spend the money wisely. Citizens of Joplin need to voice their opinion either way. City management needs to hear from the people.
Saad Al-shathir, M.D.
Joplin
Opinion
Voices: Memorial Hall crazy idea
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


