The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 29, 2013

Our View: 'Rebuilt stronger'

Example set by Carl Junction, Pierce City serve us all well

— The 2011 tornado that hit Joplin was so big, so off-the-scale monstrous, that we sometimes forget that before that awful Sunday night, there were other awful Sunday nights.

One of the worst was May 4, 2003, when a series of tornadoes caused widespread damage throughout the region. Tornadoes that night left 19 people from Cherokee County, Kan., to Stockton dead and injured 143 others. Thousands of homes were damaged or destroyed.

Yet, drive through some of these areas today and you wouldn’t guess it.

There’s little in Carl Junction to indicate the scale of what happened there, when 30 percent of the town was hit by an F-3, including school and municipal buildings.

Small unincorporated Franklin, Kan., too, shows few of its scars from the F-4. About one-third of its homes and several community buildings were hit.

Of all the victims of that storm, Pierce City still shows the most wounds. It lost many of its historic, turn-of-the-century limestone buildings on Main Street. It still has a few holes that testify to its tornado, but it remains a close-knit, vibrant community.

Universally, the communities hit in 2003 found that they were stronger — and in some ways better — for what had happened.

There is a lesson for us all in that.

Amy Skiles was in her home in Carl Junction that evening. She survived, along with her family and two children, but it was a month before they returned to their own house again.

Skiles has something that perhaps we in Joplin still haven’t had a chance to develop: the perspective of time.

“We rebuilt stronger. We moved on,” she said recently.

So it will be for Joplin.

So it will be the next time, after some other awful Sunday night.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN
Sports