The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 17, 2011

Our View: Ignoring voters

JOPLIN, Mo. — Dumb voters. That’s the message elected officials sent their constituents last week.

First, the Webb City City Council turned a deaf ear to voters who, in a straw poll, said they wanted their town to go smoke-free. Then, later in the week, the Missouri Legislature overturned a ballot initiative passed by the voters in November that placed more restrictions on dog breeders.

The state’s action is causing a statewide uproar among voters who cast their ballot for Proposition B last fall, many of whom are asking themselves why they even bothered to show up in the first place. And in the Webb City straw poll, residents are left to wonder why the council asked for their opinion if it already had its mind made up about a smoking ban.

Getting voters fired up enough to show up on election day is no easy task. Voter apathy, especially in local races, is at an all-time high.

So why do elected officials continue to thumb their noses at the people who sign their paychecks?

The answer lies in the unwillingness of our representatives to listen to their constituents in the first place. In Webb City, council members should have rejected the smoking ban during a regular council session if that’s what they wanted to do. We suspect they thought the voters would do it for them. When that didn’t happen, they made the decision they wanted all along.

At the state level, legislators could have dealt with the issue of bad actors in the dog-breeding business by strengthening laws and putting more inspectors on the job. An initiative petition would not have been necessary if they had been minding the store in the first place.

In both cases, elected officials have failed to listen and that could cost them their jobs.

We can only hope then that voters will still have the last word.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
NDN Video
Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN