SENECA, Mo. —
In the Aug. 20 issue of the Globe, a lady wrote to complain about the Missouri State Proposition C. Her complaint was that the wording was so confusing that she could not understand it. I believe that her real problem was that she was opposed to its passage.
She repeated some arguments that were made by the Obama administration trying to justify the passage of a mandatory feature of the legislation that everyone “must” have health insurance, under penalty of federal law. A supposed analogy was drawn between the requirement that automobile owners must have insurance on their cars.
There are several logical problems with the analogy she and others have proposed between auto and health insurance. 1. Not everyone is required to have auto insurance, in fact, only the person owning the automobile is so required. 2. The only insurance stipulated is liability, which covers the other driver for losses incurred at my liability. 3. Some auto owners are exempted from this law, namely, those who can show sufficient assets to stand good for their own liability. 4. Liability insurance is required by the state, not by the federal government. 5. Collision and personal loss insurance is not required unless there is a lien against the auto; and this is a requirement made by the lending institution not the state. It is noteworthy that personal loss insurance would be the type most analogous to health insurance.
I hope this will serve to sweep away some of the confusion that the letter-writer experienced, and about which some others may have had problems. I praise the voters of Missouri for taking this logical and brave stand by passing Proposition C. (Incidentally, I too had taken time to make up my mind before I went into the voting booth.)
Riley T. Jay
Seneca
Opinion
Voices: No confusion here
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






