The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 15, 2013

Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Deterrence still works

JOPLIN, Mo. — Why all the fuss over North Korea? Frankly, I wonder if all the fuss is simply a distraction, overstating North Korea’s threat to America. In my view, that international situation remains very manageable.

It has been clear to Western intelligence services for many years now that the North Koreans probably have made some nuclear weapons.

Some think they now have the ballistic missile technology to explode such devices outside their national boundaries. Of course, the challenge to any intelligence service is to figure out exactly how far outside those national boundaries they might be able to strike with nuclear warheads.

Does that concern sound something like the question of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq at the beginning of the 21st century? Who knows the answer with certainty today? The real question seems to me to be, “Will North Korea use such nuclear weapons if they have them and the ability to fly them to targets somewhere in the world today?” I believe the answer is no.

Why would I think that? The answer is simple. Nuclear deterrence remains the firmest possible prevention of the use of nuclear weapons by anyone, anywhere today. Use them anywhere and see what you might get back, right in your lap, so to speak.

So to me the real question before us is how strong America’s nuclear deterrence posture is. Do we have the means to strike back with overwhelming force and do we have the will to do so if deterrence fails? That turns the question around to challenge America, which is the only thing (ultimately) that prevented a nuclear exchange in previous decades.

Ultimately, America cannot control a madman or a crazy nation from using nuclear weapons. But consider this scenario: Let’s say Guam is struck by a nuclear warhead launched from North Korea. Would President Barack Obama, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Secretary of State John Kerry — the core of our National Command Authority — respond in kind back to North Korea?

If there is any doubt that America will not do so, then nuclear deterrence is weakened, to the point that it might not work.

That is a far more dangerous world than when there was no doubt at all what America would do.

Anson Burlingame lives in Joplin.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating