The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 9, 2014

Our View: Don’t exempt animal data

Details about diseased animals and agriculture events that could pose a public health threat should be open to the public for obvious reasons.

But legislation proposed in Missouri would wall off the public from data collected by state agencies under the federal Animal Disease Traceability Program.

Rep. Bill Reiboldt, R-Neosho, is one of the sponsors of the bill. Reiboldt, a former dairy former, says he thinks “it’s better kept quiet — not hidden — so you have the facts when you come out with it rather than upsetting people.”

Having the facts is imperative, but why should that make such information exempt from the Missouri Sunshine Law? Is it because an exemption would provide more time to create a story to tell the public instead of the truth?

The report of livestock diseases has been mandated in Missouri for years. It is how we keep diseased animals quarantined and how we keep consumers safe.

Reiboldt also cites animal rights activists who he says are looking for ways to undermine agriculture in the state using negative publicity.

The Missouri Press Association, of which The Joplin Globe is a member, has testified that closure of the information “will raise a red flag for consumers about what may be hidden.”

The bill has received support from the Missouri Pork Association, the Missouri Farm Bureau, the Missouri Federation of Animal Owners and the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association.

But we can see nothing good coming out of keeping secrets about the details of diseased animals in our state. The bill exempts registration, animal identification, environmental and animal tracking data collected by any state agency from disclosure requirements as well as data collected for the purpose of animal health or environmental protection.

Transparency about the food we eat seems to be in the public interest. We would urge legislators to keep this information open.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating