PITTSBURG, Kan. —
Traditionally, Kansas state and local governments have been funded by income, sales and property taxes. However this year two of these sources have been reduced by passage of Senate Substitute for House Bill 2117. This measure will lower the amount collected in both sales and income taxes. Proponents of this bill believe that supply side economics touted by Arthur Laffer, Gov. Sam Brownback and their followers in the Kansas Legislature will possibly increase jobs and possibly increase revenues in a sufficient amount to offset the certain losses in revenue because of Senate Substitute for House Bill 2117.
Our Kansas Constitution doesn’t allow for deficit spending. If this gamble doesn’t pay off, the state will be billions short of revenue by 2018.
This in turn will put pressure to raise property taxes by school districts to make up for shortfalls in state funding. Presently many areas in Southeast Kansas have mill levies that are either at or close to 200 mills. Our effective tax rates are already exceedingly high for residential and commercial real estate. Property taxes have been high in the past, and the likelihood of them increasing significantly in the future is very great because of this bill. However the problems just begin with increased property taxes because of this bill. Our regents system will be negatively impacted by increased tuition and fees. Funding for essential services will be difficult. If legislative research revenue estimates are correct, we will be billions in the hole by 2018.
I am sure my state representative, Terry Calloway, and my state senator, Bob Marshall, both had good intentions when they voted for this bill. Unfortunately for them and the people they represent, “the road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
It is my sincere hope that I am wrong about what is going to happen in the future because of passage of this bill. However, if my fears do come true, then most Kansans will be negatively impacted in a big way.
Phil Martin
Pittsburg, Kan.
Former state senator, District 13
Opinion
Your View: Bad for Kansas
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Setting standard
The sight of hundreds of young student volunteers walking across Moore’s Fourth Street interstate overpass had to be uplifting to the city’s tornado victims.
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



