The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


February 8, 2013

Other Views: Restricting lawmakers

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Vilifying lobbyists is a popular pastime in Missouri — particularly in Jefferson City.

Pardon us for not piling on.

A bill pre-filed by state Sen. John Lamping, R-Ladue, would prohibit lawmakers from lobbying within two years of leaving office.

The only existing restrictions apply to state department directors and other appointed officials, who are prohibited from lobbying their former agency within a year after leaving office and from ever lobbying on an issue they worked on while in public office.

Lamping recently had second thoughts on the legislative prohibition — not to reduce the limit, but to extend it, in the words of the fictional Buzz Lightyear, “to infinity and beyond.”

His revised proposal prohibits anyone elected after Jan. 1, 2014, from ever serving as a registered lobbyist in Missouri. The ban applies, he said, to people elected to “any statewide office and any federal office (including) Congress, president and all that stuff.”

Lamping acknowledged the prevailing public perception of lawmakers who become lobbyists when he said: “I just think that, in this day and age, the general public looks at it as something’s going on that they don’t know about — that there’s something there that just doesn’t pass the smell test.”

The axiomatic translation is: “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know.” And the smell test involves suspicions that ex-lawmakers may have worked with current lawmakers who still owe them favors.

Is the smell test sufficient to restrict careers in the private sector? Is it sufficient to violate someone’s First Amendment rights by preventing them from taking a job that would let them speak on a subject of their choosing?

We’re not convinced. In this era of legislative term limits, the careers of lobbyists may extend well beyond those of lawmakers.

Legislators, like journalists, face the challenge of grappling with issues that are not necessarily within their realm of knowledge or expertise.

Lobbyists are a resource. They advocate for or against proposals, citing background information, statistics, experiences of other governing bodies, and actual or potential consequences.

Admittedly, lobbyists are a biased resource.

But seeking balance is a responsibility for policymakers, not lobbyists.

If legislators are making decisions without hearing from both — sometimes multiple — sides on any issue, the fault may lie in the office, not the hallways.

We’re not saying every lobbyist is a paragon of virtue who never has flexed the rules or the truth.

But rather than restrict private sector opportunities, we believe voters have a responsibility to elect representatives who demonstrate integrity.

The News Tribune, Jefferson City

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue