When we pay our monthly bills at home, we follow a budget and spend only what we bring in. So when our budgets get lean and we have to cut back, we look at unnecessary spending.
Maybe that means we buy hamburger instead of steak. We get generic items instead of name-brand items.
The federal government has a chance to cut $2 billion annually for the next decade by rescinding government subsidies to the five largest oil companies in the world, according to a bill sponsored by Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon and Shell reported profits of $32 billion in the first quarter alone. So we support McCaskill’s idea to get those subsidies back.
A similar idea in the House calls for scaling back even more of the $4.4 billion in annual tax breaks available to all oil companies. We favor McCaskill’s approach, because it leaves smaller businesses alone.
In fact, that’s the biggest thing we like about McCaskill’s bill: It is meant to stop giving money to entities that are making their own money hand over foot.
Opponents of the bill suggest that this is just a cheap attempt to get headlines and score political points by taking advantage of how we’re all fuming over gas prices. They also say it’s an attempt to punish “Big Oil.” Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., says the bill could cost jobs and raise the price at the pump even higher.
We are skeptical that the companies would be hurt by the loss of the subsidies.
An Associated Press analysis suggests that the price of oil is so high that removing all of the tax breaks for oil productions (not just McCaskill’s targets) would barely have an effect on oil production.
This is not class warfare. This is not political. It’s not punishment for pain at the pump.
It’s a good, common-sense idea to help our ultimate goal of reducing government spending.
Opinion
Our view: Another place to cut spending
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Spying on us
Distrust of government secrecy has been elevated to an exceptional level with the disclosure the Justice Department covertly examined two months of Associated Press phone records to determine who leaked details to the AP about a foiled terrorist plot.
-
Our View: Pass on the legacy
Forty hungry members of the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteer Infantry began gathering corn at the Rader farm near the village of Sherwood when they were ambushed by a guerrilla band of about 70 Southern sympathizers.
-
Our View: Big Brother looms large
The federal government, working under the cloak of secrecy, has been having a heyday at the expense of all Americans.
-
Our View: Disgraceful military assault
We want to make one thing clear: A sexual assault is not a sex scandal. Nor can the rise in sexual assaults in the military be justified in any way.
-
Elliott Denniston, guest columnist: Right-to-work laws only hurt workers
Middle-class workers have been fighting an uphill battle for the past 30 years.
-
Your View: Food drive efforts
Branch No. 366 of the National Association of Letter Carriers along with the National Rural Letter Carriers Association, the American Postal Workers Union and the U.S. Postal Service would like to thank all the area communities that participated in the 2013 Stamp Out Hunger food drive.
-
Your View: More about tax credit
The Globe’s editorial in “Our View” (May 10) may have left readers with a few inaccurate impressions.
-
Other Views: Sickening disparity
Don’t feel bad if you don’t understand the wide, sometimes huge, discrepancies in fees hospitals charge for the same procedure. Or if you don’t understand the arithmetical magic the hospitals use to arrive at those fees.
-
Carol Stark: America in need of more 'momisms'
Several years ago, I attended a writing workshop where one of the sessions was called “Tell it to Mom.”
-
Our View: Keep learning
Donna Maus, a biology teacher from St. Mary’s Colgan High School in Pittsburg, Kan., told a group of top students, their parents and their teachers something we think everyone needs to hear.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



