In the editorial “Too much talk over Career Ladder” (Oct. 10), the Globe suggests that the Career Ladder issue should be discussed and resolved privately rather than publicly. That’s an interesting point of view from a source that has been such a loud advocate for the Sunshine Law and openness in public policy.
The fact is that this proposal was discussed privately with the governor. I first proposed the idea of resolving the Career Ladder issue with a supplemental budget request in a meeting with Gov. Jay Nixon in his office Sept. 16. Appropriations Vice Chairman Rob Mayer and the governor’s chief of staff John Watson were also present.
Nixon indicated to me that he would consider the proposal. I asked him at the time what his intentions were regarding the Career Ladder program, and he indicated that he had made no decision on it.
In the following days I raised the issue again with Budget Director Linda Luebbering on three separate occasions. I asked her specifically what the governor’s intentions were regarding Career Ladder and she said each time that she did not know, but she pointed out the size of the budget shortfall and the difficulty that finding $37 million would represent in the current fiscal environment.
As late as Thursday morning, a few hours before my press conference, I presented the proposal to Watson yet again, and he gave me no indication that the governor would oppose my proposal. I asked him to tell me what Nixon’s intentions were regarding funding the ongoing Career Ladder activities, and he told me that he did not know, but he reminded me again of the budget shortfall.
The payment-in-arrears problem is no technicality but a serious breach of the budget process. The fact is that each year this program is operated with no appropriation authority, in the hope that it will be reimbursed by an action of a future legislature.
This out-of-sequence funding scheme occurred as a result of a one-year withholding of the funds in 1991. It is not a technicality that the teachers’ and schools’ funding is threatened; it is a fact.
The threat does not come from a disagreement between the political parties about the worth of the program. It comes from the shortage of revenues. The governor could have told me at any time from the September meeting on that he was opposed to a supplemental budget request to put the program back on schedule, but he did not.
The Globe also read more into Jack Cardetti’s statement than was there. Cardetti said that the governor funded Career Ladder in last year’s budget and would put money for it in this year’s budget as well. He did not say how much money the governor planned to put in.
The whole point of my proposal is not to tie the governor’s hand or bind him to any specific dollar commitment. It is that once the consensus revenue estimate is arrived at, the governor will be in a position to know how much he can commit to this program.
The funds could be allocated in a supplemental budget request, or if the decision was to not fund the program or to only partially fund it, that could be communicated to the education community in January. By putting the program back on schedule, schools and teachers would have certainty.
To put funds in next year’s budget in arrears, whether it is the full amount or a partial funding, would force school districts again to make this program a gamble. Funding can never be certain until the appropriation is passed and signed by the governor.
This is a serious funding issue. There is no certainty that this year’s program will be fully funded. That is not a technicality, but a serious problem for Missouri public education.
Sen. Gary Nodler represents District 32 in the Missouri Senate and is the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Opinion
Guest columnist Sen. Gary Nodler: Career Ladder's problem not a technicality
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
-
Our View: Meaningless in Missouri
Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






