Representatives of 192 nations are preparing to descend on Denmark in mid-December to talk about global climate change, its causes, the solution to the problem and a binding international treaty to enforce and fund the agreement.
But we believe there are too many questions unanswered to commit to what is dubbed the “Copenhagen Treaty.”
The clear intent behind current draft documents for the treaty is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by industrialized countries, provide financial support to developing countries to help limit their emissions, and to create a multinational organization to control the money exchanged in the process.
In our view, we should take care of business at home before joining the international coalition. The effects of man-made emissions on global climate and the actions needed to reduce such effects is an unsettled political issue both domestically and internationally. Even the science is unsettled.
How big the problems are and how drastic the actions must be to remedy them is a huge debate without clear answers. We need solid science and good answers before we enter into international agreements.
Until the new administration, Congress, emitters of greenhouse gas and the American people demonstrate the political will to embrace the steps necessary at home to cut harmful emissions, how can we expect other countries to do the same? We challenge representatives of President Barack Obama’s administration at the upcoming summit to negotiate in good faith, look for areas on which we can build climate consensus with other industrialized nations, and set attainable goals for reducing our own emissions before moving toward an international accord.
Yvo De Boer, a Dutch diplomat who heads up the United Nations climate secretariat, was quoted Tuesday in a New York Times column as saying, “There isn’t sufficient time to get the whole thing done.” But, he added, he hoped the meeting would “go well beyond simply a declaration of principles.” Boer said he hopes the Copenhagen meeting would lay “groundwork for a ratifiable agreement next year.”
We would caution that bypassing American political consensus on this issue through the use of an international treaty, until we get our own house in order, is the wrong approach.
Opinion
In Our View: Not the time for climate treaty
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


