Some proponents of change try to discount economic consequences by making comparisons to post-World War II debt: We got out of that situation then, and we can do it now.
We disagree.
Defense spending was the cause of postwar deficits, with 90 percent of federal spending in 1945 attributed to defense. Upon conclusion of the war and subsequent demobilization, deficits vanished and surpluses were available in a two-year period.
According to current budget estimates, in 2016, entitlements and debt interest payments will be almost 70 percent of all federal spending. Can anyone suggest how to “demobilize” those costs? In that same year defense spending is estimated to be 18 percent of federal spending. How much more would anyone suggest that we cut significant funds in that area?
In postwar America, the debt was held by Americans through the use of war bonds. Inflation alone took care of that debt. A $50 bond in 1945 was a nice sum of money. Consider its worth in 1980. Today, over half of our debt is held in foreign countries. Watch the run on the dollar if we print money to get out of that debt. Unprecedented is a good word for that situation.
Take just this past year, with a federal deficit of $1.4 trillion. Try to find a way to turn that sum into a surplus in, what, five years, or 10 years, or pick your time frame. The stated goal of government now is not to regain surpluses; it is simply to reduce the annual deficit (not, we emphasize, the total debt). Take what we consider a “best case” scenario in the president’s current estimates, and we find a $20 trillion debt in 2019. And that is without additional costs of all the change being proposed.
Someday, maybe sooner than we think, the pain associated with such debt and spending will be that word again: unprecedented. The longer we wait, the greater the pain.
Opinion
In Our View: Unprecedented economy
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


