Some proponents of change try to discount economic consequences by making comparisons to post-World War II debt: We got out of that situation then, and we can do it now.
We disagree.
Defense spending was the cause of postwar deficits, with 90 percent of federal spending in 1945 attributed to defense. Upon conclusion of the war and subsequent demobilization, deficits vanished and surpluses were available in a two-year period.
According to current budget estimates, in 2016, entitlements and debt interest payments will be almost 70 percent of all federal spending. Can anyone suggest how to “demobilize” those costs? In that same year defense spending is estimated to be 18 percent of federal spending. How much more would anyone suggest that we cut significant funds in that area?
In postwar America, the debt was held by Americans through the use of war bonds. Inflation alone took care of that debt. A $50 bond in 1945 was a nice sum of money. Consider its worth in 1980. Today, over half of our debt is held in foreign countries. Watch the run on the dollar if we print money to get out of that debt. Unprecedented is a good word for that situation.
Take just this past year, with a federal deficit of $1.4 trillion. Try to find a way to turn that sum into a surplus in, what, five years, or 10 years, or pick your time frame. The stated goal of government now is not to regain surpluses; it is simply to reduce the annual deficit (not, we emphasize, the total debt). Take what we consider a “best case” scenario in the president’s current estimates, and we find a $20 trillion debt in 2019. And that is without additional costs of all the change being proposed.
Someday, maybe sooner than we think, the pain associated with such debt and spending will be that word again: unprecedented. The longer we wait, the greater the pain.
Opinion
In Our View: Unprecedented economy
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






