There is an incessant demand from most Americans for continuation of all approved government programs at the federal, state and local level. Any cuts in such programs are met with resistance, if not screams of outrage.
We are in a recession, a big one. Economic growth is stagnant. Government and personal income is down. Many suffer with no jobs. It is not surprising that government, as well as private industry, must “tighten their belts” and make do with less money, almost across the board.
In the face of such public demands, governments are doing everything they can to increase their revenue. But sometimes they are sneaky in doing so.
In nearby Cherokee County, Kan., commissioners earlier this year were pleased with the 2010 budget and said they would keep the property tax rate the same as last year’s. But when the county’s tax rate was certified with the state, it was set at 53.201 mills, higher than this year’s rate of 52.869 mills. That’s because the county’s property valuation decreased and the previous tax rate, the commissioners said, would not have covered expenses. Because Missouri has the Hancock Amendment, voters definitely have more input about having their taxes raised. The same is not true elsewhere.
The state of California, which we understand is tottering on bankruptcy, recently “decreed” an additional 10 percent withholding on all wages. What elected body or individual approved that absurd edict without debate and transparency? New York state seems headed in the same direction.
Taking money of any sort from individuals and private businesses for government use is either a tax or a fee. A little here and a little there, and suddenly your available income as a citizen is noticeably down. You look around for whom to blame and find no one. It simply happens by decree in many cases.
We are not necessarily against any and all tax increases. It is simple economics to not do so during a recession, however, and it would take a true emergency of sizable proportions to persuade us to raise any taxes right now.
It is, however, inexcusable anytime to raise taxes, fees, whatever government collects, without a full and open debate pro or con.
Opinion
In Our View: Sneaky taxes
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Raw Video: Gay Protest Blocked in Moscow
Vatican in Chaos After Butler Arrested for Leaks
Jimmy Carter Endorses Egypt's Election Results
Biden Addresses West Point Graduating Class
Dozens of Children Killed in New Syria Attack
Raw Video: Activists Allege Massacre in Syria
NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz
Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp
Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium
50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning
Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House
Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami
Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window
Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station
Calif.'s Coronado Named Nation's Best Beach
CEO Salaries Become Sore Issue in Labor Disputes
