The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force earlier this week updated guidelines, saying women in their 40s do not need routine mammograms for early detection of breast cancer.
Apparently these “experts” — none of whom are oncologists — haven’t been reading our obituaries lately. Hardly a week goes by without a woman in her 40s dying of breast cancer.
We would invite this panel to come to Southwest Missouri and meet Carl Junction Postmaster Sharon Clark, a breast cancer survivor, who just worked to sell more than $10,000 worth of breast cancer stamps and raised $2,000 for breast cancer research.
Or maybe they could talk to Sarah Burkybile of Joplin, who, at age 28, is finishing her second round of chemotherapy after a reappearance of breast cancer.
Ask Kim Weathers about breast cancer. The 47-year-old Joplin woman was 26 when she was diagnosed with breast cancer.
The American Cancer Society looked at the same data as the task force but came to an entirely different conclusion, and continues to recommend women should get annual breast exams beginning at age 40. Experts at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center also voiced concern and said they aren’t changing their screening protocol.
“We disagree with their conclusions,” Dr. Therese Bevers said of the task force. “You have to screen more women. It’s the value we put on zero women dying.”
Just coming off October’s Breast Cancer Awareness month, this report, in our view, has done damage and created confusion, and could keep women from being screened.
We are also concerned that some health insurance carriers might decide not to cover mammograms for women in the 40 to 50 age group, or that they might have to jump through hoops to be reimbursed.
This is one health report we hope will largely be ignored.
Opinion
In Our View: Step in the wrong direction on breast cancer screening
- Opinion
-
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
Our View: Meaningless in Missouri
Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter.
-
Carol Stark: Joplin’s future depends on today’s land ethic
Leopold’s small book of essays and philosophical writings about the ethical call to love and respect the land made a big impact on the conservation movement over 60 years ago, and it continues to do so today.
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
-
Sunday Forum: Digital dilemma
Are hard-bound textbooks going the way of slide rules and typewriters in schools?
Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski last week challenged schools and companies to get digital textbooks in students’ hands within five years. -
Our View: Elections and war
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has now indicated hopes, maybe even intentions, for ending the combat mission in Afghanistan by mid-2013 in advance of the complete troop withdrawal already announced for the end of 2014.
-
Your View: Changes to Joplin
I grew up in the Blendville area of Joplin on the southwest side of town.
-
Your View: Happy Chinese
I’m sure the Chinese are very happy that the Americans spent billions on Christmas buying thousands of the items made in China. They have billions of dollars pouring in, and what are they doing with a large percent of the money?
-
Our View: Weasel words
In his Missourinet blog this week, Bob Priddy took state legislators to task for rhetoric and tossing about phrases such as revenue enhancement.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






