In our view: Tough questions to answer

Opinion

Related Photos

Discussion

November 21, 2009

Anonymous The Joplin Globe Sat Nov 21, 2009, 08:21 AM CST

Should suspected terrorists allegedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks be tried under American federal law in open court?

Proponents for this action being taken by the president and his attorney general argue that our system can handle it. They claim that we can “show the world” how American justice can prevail under all circumstances.

In essence, they argue that the “propaganda value” (though they do not call it such) outweighs the risk involved by having a fair and open trial under American jurisprudence and ultimate conviction and punishment for the alleged criminals. They may well be correct in such assertions.

But we have some questions about this matter. First, where will 12 good men and women be found as juries to hear these cases. Are there 12 people in the United States who are not aware of the circumstances surrounding the attacks and have not formed an opinion one way or the other about their causes?

The suspects were apprehended in a foreign country by foreign forces and held for some time in foreign custody. Were American standards for legal search, seizure and apprehension followed? What if they were not?

Once delivered into U.S. custody, were American standards of jurisprudence in terms of confinement, interrogation, presence of legal representatives and a host of other issues followed in strict compliance with our laws?

Exactly what evidence gained over the last six or seven years while the accused were in custody will be admissible under federal law? Some say at least one accused has “confessed.” Was he “waterboarded” before or after the confession? What if any one of the accused faced the threat of waterboarding or other rough interrogation? Is anything he said after such threat admissible?

Who is to decide such questions and under what form of jurisprudence will he/she base such decisions? Are we going to “wing the law” as we go in this difficult case?

The attorney general has told the Senate that such matters are under control and has guaranteed a conviction. What about the presumption of innocence? We sure hope the future jurors have not heard that statement from the senior law enforcement official in the United States.

Text Only

Opinion

Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.

February 10, 2012 1 Photo
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.

February 9, 2012 1 Photo
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.

February 8, 2012 1 Photo
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?

February 8, 2012
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.

February 8, 2012
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.

February 8, 2012
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.

February 7, 2012 1 Photo
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).

February 6, 2012
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.

February 4, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Water company cites reconnections

Opinion

Search Results

Related Photos

Discussion

In our view: Tough questions to answer

Joplin City Manager Mark Rohr wants the city to distribute weather radios to all Joplin homes that don’t have one. That’s 11,000 radios. Do you think that’s a good use of $300,440?

Joplin City Manager Mark Rohr wants the city to distribute weather radios to all Joplin homes that don’t have one. That’s 11,000 radios. Do you think that’s a good use of $300,440?

Site Map

Contact Us