Finally, it seems that a real debate over a real bill will begin on health care reform.
The Senate cleared the way Saturday for debate on legislation unveiled by Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. The bill, a compromise between two committee-passed versions, could undergo significant changes as senators amend it during weeks of debate ahead.
Our first question is: How do reasonable people conduct a real debate on such a volume of information? Consider this point: Undoubtedly the final product (assuming anything is passed, which we do think will happen) will be hundreds of pages long. Even with the best of intentions and even with a unanimous vote to approve the bill, there will be inevitable unintended consequences in a bill of such length.
Lawyers and regulators will pore over every written word to justify future issues in court or regulations based on this law. Again, in spite of best intentions, will any court be able to decide the “intent of Congress”? Lawsuits will be decided, and people will be granted or denied huge sums of money based on such interpretations. Are we ready to take that risk with such a bill?
One side will say the bill saves money over the long term. The other will say it could lead to national bankruptcy. How do we the people decide who is right just on that point alone?
An intriguing “60 Minutes” segment on Sunday addressed the issue of end-of-life care. It claimed that Medicare alone spent $50 billion last year on such care, more than the entire Department of Education or Homeland Security budgets. Does this bill address such costs and provide a means to reduce them?
Is this bill just the beginning or does it mark some “end” of tortuous political achievement? Is the bill real progress in human achievement or a huge step backward? For sure we will hear both arguments.
What is really at stake in this debate? Will we the people simply continue our daily lives with little or no consequences, or is something much more fundamental at the heart of this debate?
Our elected senators now hold the answers to these and many other questions in their hands. That is for sure awesome responsibility. Before anyone launches the inevitable partisan response, remember that we the people put that responsibility in their hands. Can we live with the consequences? And what will we do if our answer is “no”?
Opinion
Related Photos
Discussion
In our view: Let debates commence
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate
US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany
Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords
Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria
Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC
Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion'
5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La.
Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens
Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag
Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs
Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames
LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal
$25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines
LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens
Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life
Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal
Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Ga Girl Fights Off Kidnapper at Walmart
