Any wartime political or military leader must routinely confront the question of whether to advance, remain in place or retreat.
It is a fundamental issue of any war, whether for a soldier in a foxhole, a senior officer directing a battalion or a general directing divisions. Presidents are ultimately held accountable for such decisions.
Our president has made his decision. He has said advance, challenge the enemy, move forward to take territory and hold it — all those things needed to fight an aggressive war American style. He took his time making the decision while others, wrongfully in our view, urged him to rush ahead.
In our view, the keynote struck by the president was: “I make this decision because I am convinced that our security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is the epicenter of violent extremism practiced by al-Qaida. It is from here that we were attacked on 9/11, and it is from here that new attacks are being plotted as I speak.”
The challenge before the president was to “make his case” for the announced troop increase. For those already encouraging escalation, the above statement is certainly reason enough.
We doubt any already-entrenched positions either in Congress or the American people at large were changed as a result of his speech. To us, that is disappointing. His speech turned few heads or changed many minds.
Congress will balk but will probably ultimately approve the required funds to support the president.
The president has made a difficult decision. Let the consequences be shown, as necessary, in future elections. For now, in our view, we should look to the future in Afghanistan and find ways to build unity not only there but right here at home. Unity is in the best interests of both countries.
Opinion
In Our View: President’s speech
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






