Editorial
Related Photos
Discussion
In Our View: President’s speech
Any wartime political or military leader must routinely confront the question of whether to advance, remain in place or retreat.
It is a fundamental issue of any war, whether for a soldier in a foxhole, a senior officer directing a battalion or a general directing divisions. Presidents are ultimately held accountable for such decisions.
Our president has made his decision. He has said advance, challenge the enemy, move forward to take territory and hold it — all those things needed to fight an aggressive war American style. He took his time making the decision while others, wrongfully in our view, urged him to rush ahead.
In our view, the keynote struck by the president was: “I make this decision because I am convinced that our security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is the epicenter of violent extremism practiced by al-Qaida. It is from here that we were attacked on 9/11, and it is from here that new attacks are being plotted as I speak.”
The challenge before the president was to “make his case” for the announced troop increase. For those already encouraging escalation, the above statement is certainly reason enough.
We doubt any already-entrenched positions either in Congress or the American people at large were changed as a result of his speech. To us, that is disappointing. His speech turned few heads or changed many minds.
Congress will balk but will probably ultimately approve the required funds to support the president.
The president has made a difficult decision. Let the consequences be shown, as necessary, in future elections. For now, in our view, we should look to the future in Afghanistan and find ways to build unity not only there but right here at home. Unity is in the best interests of both countries.
- Editorial
-
-
Scorecard for voters
The Missouri Bar on Wednesday recommended that voters give a St. Louis County judge the heave-ho.
The critical rating may result in the end of Associate Circuit Judge Judy Draper’s days behind the bench. It will be up to voters in that area to decide whether they want to retain Draper. -
Carol Stark: Cross words summon solution
There is nothing I have ever written about in this column that results in as much feedback as a call out to readers for suggestions about comics and puzzles.
-
Guest columnist Erin Noble: America should be clean energy leader
After nearly two years of work on a comprehensive climate change and clean energy bill, Senate Democrats recently abandoned efforts in exchange for a weakened “oil spill bill.” Citing their inabilities to overcome a Republican filibuster, the oil spill bill includes only minor clean energy provisions and completely fails to address the underlying causes of the climate crisis. Luckily, the weakened bill did not advance before the Senate’s August recess. This provides one last chance for the bill to be amended with a national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) when the Senate reconvenes later this month.
-
Guest columnist Robert M. Clayton III: Need help paying your phone bill?
Telephone service is a vital communication link to health care, family and friends. However, some Missourians do not have access to such a link because of financial difficulties. There are programs available to help qualified Missourians receive a discount on monthly telephone bills and provide a reduction in installation and connection fees.
-
Voices: Up, up and away
It’s hard to keep a good plane down. When my husband was in the service during World War II, he was in the Air Force and his second home while he was stationed in England was a B-17 Flying Fortress.
-
Voices: ‘Yes’ correct answer
Joan Umphenour (Globe, Aug. 19), who has a master’s degree, is upset because most of us Missourians apparently didn’t understand the ballot in Missouri about the health care bill because she couldn’t understand it. She apparently thinks we voted “yes” meaning “no.”
-
Voices: No choice perfect
Jim Stone’s guest column (Globe, Aug. 29) on the surface seems well thought out and even persuasive. What it lacks is a basic understanding of what the access to some means of self-defense really is.
-
Voices: Hidden bias
I must admit the Globe did a pretty good job hiding obvious bias (In our view, Globe, Sept. 3), but you seem to have conveniently forgotten there is a very clear difference here in that one of the candidates here is of the party that got us in this mess and voted lock step with the (former) president who led us to this crisis to begin with.
-
Voices: Volunteers needed
They come to Joplin Neighborhood Adult Literacy Read to improve their literacy skills in English, and we are committed to providing services to enable them to reach their full potential. To do that, we offer help in reading, math and English as a second language with one-on-one tutors and classes. Right now we are looking for a few more good volunteers who want to take the training to work with our students.
-
Voices: Signing dog’s death warrant
On Wednesday evening while driving on Joplin’s North Main Street, I hit and killed a beautiful bloodhound dog.
This dog, whether lost or dumped by his owner at the nearby Humane Society, was in the turn lane with heavy traffic on both sides of it. - More Editorial Headlines
-
Scorecard for voters
