R. Duane Graham, in a recent Globe column (11/29/09) titled “Senate is a peculiar place,” used the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to demean conservatives. He writes about “conservative opposition to the Civil Rights Act . . .” Mr. Graham, apparently, does not let facts get in the way of his opinions or writings.
History shows Republicans standing for freedom. Every vote “against” the amendment to free the slaves was cast by a Democrat. Every vote against anti-lynching legislation was cast by a Democrat. The truth is 69 percent of Democrats in the Senate and 61 percent of Democrats in the House voted for the Civil Rights Act, while 82 percent of Republicans in the Senate and 80 percent of Republicans in the House voted for the act.
The filibuster against the act was led by a Democrat, Robert C. Byrd (still there today), one of the most liberal senators. The Senate was able to break the filibuster and pass the bill only because of the overwhelming support of the Republicans. (It took 67 votes back then to cut off debate). The conservatives are still standing for freedom and “against” the present health care reform bill because it would take away freedom (among other things)!
Bob Turner
Joplin
Opinion
Republicans standing for freedom
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
Our View: Meaningless in Missouri
Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter.
-
Carol Stark: Joplin’s future depends on today’s land ethic
Leopold’s small book of essays and philosophical writings about the ethical call to love and respect the land made a big impact on the conservation movement over 60 years ago, and it continues to do so today.
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
-
Sunday Forum: Digital dilemma
Are hard-bound textbooks going the way of slide rules and typewriters in schools?
Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski last week challenged schools and companies to get digital textbooks in students’ hands within five years. -
Our View: Elections and war
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has now indicated hopes, maybe even intentions, for ending the combat mission in Afghanistan by mid-2013 in advance of the complete troop withdrawal already announced for the end of 2014.
-
Your View: Changes to Joplin
I grew up in the Blendville area of Joplin on the southwest side of town.
-
Your View: Happy Chinese
I’m sure the Chinese are very happy that the Americans spent billions on Christmas buying thousands of the items made in China. They have billions of dollars pouring in, and what are they doing with a large percent of the money?
- More Opinion Headlines
-






