There has been a massive disclosure of classified information about the war in Afghanistan, even to the point that some are comparing the WikiLeaks documents to the Vietnam-era Pentagon Papers.
Similarities seem only surface.
Consider the mood of the country in 1971 as opposed to now. We had over 500,000 troops involved, many of them draftees, in a long and frustrating war that outraged the majority of Americans. There were routine and massive anti-Vietnam rallies. Returning veterans were shunned, even spit upon, and called baby killers.
In essence the Pentagon Papers disclosed a carefully developed, 22-year history of the war in Vietnam. They were policy-level documents written by highly placed leaders and their staffs. Much historical information, still highly classified, was thus revealed including at least political deception at the highest levels of government.
Not so with the WikiLeaks documents, which range from files documenting Afghan civilian deaths to evidence of U.S.-Pakistani distrust. The documents consist of primarily field reports, after-action reports and other battlefield-level communications of conditions on the ground from 2004 to 2009. No doubt the disclosures confirm that the war was not going well, our troops lacked support and Washington’s attention was elsewhere, meaning Iraq.
In essence, WikiLeaks tells us little that we did not already know, without the details. Afghanistan was for sure not going well, if not a mess.
To his credit, in 2009 President Barack Obama reviewed the situation at the policy level and made significant changes in policy, support and leadership on the ground. We are now in about the 10th month of those changes being ordered and executed. So what is revealed in the 92,000 documents is history that at least some efforts are under way to correct.
Afghanistan is not yet another Vietnam. Yes, there are many similarities, particularly from the perspective of the battlefield. But history has not yet concluded the outcome in Afghanistan. Good leadership can still make a big difference.
Opinion
In our view: Revisiting Pentagon Papers
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






