The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


July 15, 2013

Carol Stark: Anonymity and its place in the newsroom


A call came my way this past week from a person inquiring as to whether or not we would publish an unsigned, anonymous letter in our paper.

Our policy, I explained, was only to publish letters that are signed and include a town. We ask letter writers to provide us a phone number so that we might also verify that they wrote the letter if they aren’t on our “regulars” list.

My answer wasn’t what the caller wanted to hear, and she referenced other papers that will withhold a name.

Again, I answered, policy is determined by the publication, and ours is standard for most newspapers.

The phone call ended quickly with the caller giving me little time for a discussion about the reason for our policy.

But maybe you have wondered the same thing.

I say this because I regularly get letters from writers who ask that the paper not use their name. They might as well ask that we not use their letter. The request has the same effect.

Unsigned letters, just like secrecy in government, have no credibility.

While some are entertaining, they generally are filled with accusations that can’t be verified and open the newspaper up to potential libel.

You might have noticed that, with few exceptions, we don’t use anonymous sources in our news stories either.

Again, it goes to the credibility of the story. In some cases — interviews with victims of sexual abuse or the elderly who worry about being identified because they live alone — we indicate we are not using the name.

Nor do we pay for interviews or information. Quid pro quo doesn’t belong in a newsroom.

We also demand that our reporters represent themselves as reporters.

They are not allowed to participate in “sting” journalism by assuming the role of someone other than a reporter. It may make for good reality TV, but it is a practice that’s based on guile.

So how exactly does anonymity have a place in our newsroom?

We value news tips from people who want to clue us in on something that needs investigation.

For example, someone learns that their boss is dumping hazardous waste into Shoal Creek. We agree not to reveal their identity as long as they are not part of the story at hand. In fact, we are willing to go to jail to protect a source’s identity.

That is why we don’t take anonymity lightly. 

Callers who want to alert us to breaking crime, a fire or the shutdown of an industry need not identify themselves but can call our newsroom at 417-627-7273. They can also leave a message for us on our Facebook page.

While we might ask their name, it’s not a necessary component to reporting a breaking news event. Simply tell us that you would prefer not to give your name.

Carol Stark is the editor-in-chief of The Joplin Globe.


Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating