There is no question that unions, specifically public employee unions, support the Democratic Party.
The raw political combat in Wisconsin is one of the biggest examples of that type of support. It is also symptomatic of a problem facing the Democratic Party on a broad national level.
The fundamental issue is where the money will come from to meet demands by state public employee pension and health care funding both now and in the future. Despite recent tax increases, projections in Illinois show that public employee state pension funds will soon consume about 22 percent of all state revenues.
California faces similar problems, and the bond ratings for those two states reflect the lack of market confidence that the legislatures in those two states can continue to meet financial commitments in the long term.
Political rhetoric aside, the situation boils down to finding the money to pay for the health care and retirement benefits for public service employees fairly negotiated with state authorities in the past. Either state taxes must be raised or other state funding priorities must be cut.
In the past decades, optimistic projections of economic growth provided political cover for continued public service union demands for more health care benefits and retirement benefits. Our ability to fully recover from the recession has severely challenged these projections. As well, the impacts of national debt have further eroded projections.
The real challenge for the Democratic Party at both the level of state and federal funding is how to meet financial obligations and future promises to support sustainable funding for programs that have been widely popular with American voters.
The tea party in particular, and the larger GOP, have indicated reducing the current programs and limiting the growth in future programs at both state and federal levels as the preferred course of action.
It’s just one more decision voters will be making in November.
Opinion
Our View: Testing priorities
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
-
Herb B. Kuhn, guest columnist: Delaying Medicaid reform could hurt rural Missouri
The Missouri Legislature missed a rare opportunity in the just-ended session to transform Medicaid and make a real difference in the lives and health of hundreds of thousands of our neighbors. Rural Missouri has the most to lose from the legislature’s failure to act.
-
Kevin Wilson, guest columnist: When fear wins out, so do the terrorists
I’m going to make a bold statement that’s sure to draw a lot of comments, but hear me out before reaching for the keyboard to type a rebuttal.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



