A protracted debate in the Missouri General Assembly has produced a modest step toward improving transparency when labor unions collect and spend fees.
The issues before the Missouri House and Senate include whether unions should be required to annually obtain consent from workers before automatically deducting fees from their paychecks and whether unions should be required to annually get written consent in order to spend fees on political activities.
The two houses recently passed differing versions of bills that would attempt to make these requirements law. Neither bill would apply to all unions, as they variously create exemptions for first responders and public safety workers.
Union leaders are said to be unhappy with these measures. The average person without a dog in this fight must wonder why. Or worse, they come to a conclusion that is unfavorable.
Ensuring workers are informed at some regular interval that they are automatically contributing to a union’s treasury hardly is cause for alarm, unless for some reason you would oppose informing these workers of this.
Similarly, ensuring unions regularly obtain permission to use workers’ money to finance political activities seems reasonable, not onerous.
This latter idea is particularly true in light of federal law. The law says while unions can collect fees from nonunion workers, these workers can request a rebate of any fees used for political purposes. The bill before the legislature would let workers know beforehand.
Union boosters — heavily weighted to the Democratic side — lined up against the Senate bill, saying it was an effort to weaken organized labor. That could be one result, but whatever happened to the idea that knowledge is power?
No matter what agenda Republicans are pursuing, defenders of the unions are going to need to do better than arguing it is best if workers are not regularly asked how they want to pay their fees or if they want fees spent on political activities.
St. Joseph News-Press
Opinion
Other Views: Workers entitled to know
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



