Two years ago Social Security taxes were lowered by 2 percent, which resulted in an increase of about $1,000 a year in the average paycheck.
Now it seems that Congress is poised to delete that tax decrease and return Social Security withholdings to the former level.
Of course neither presidential candidate nor their respective political parties will make a public pronouncement whether such a tax “hike” (or rescinding an earlier tax cut) is the correct legislation to enact now.
All involved will wait until after the election to make their views known on such a matter.
Anyone paying attention to national fiscal matters knows full well that the long-term costs of both Social Security and Medicare are becoming far too expensive to sustain either program as we know it today.
Remember if you will that the purpose of the Social Security withholding reduction two years ago was to increase consumption in the private sector to increase the growth of our gross domestic product. But the growth in the GDP has decreased in that same two-year period.
On the other hand, such a tax “cut” amounting to about $1,000 per year is a very popular one today, even though it increases the vulnerability of the Social Security system.
That political dilemma once again demonstrates how wise governance isn’t always popular with voters.
In case you are wondering, it is our position that the original tax cut was too little, too late to make a difference, and Social Security funding should be returned to its previous legislative level now.
Opinion
Our View: Too little, too late
- Opinion
-
-
Other Views: Still inspiring
Cutbacks in the military budget and the still-recovering economy mean this Memorial Day weekend will go down as a relatively subdued affair — relative, that is, to our usual end-of-school, official-start-of-summer blowout.
-
Our View: Setting standard
The sight of hundreds of young student volunteers walking across Moore’s Fourth Street interstate overpass had to be uplifting to the city’s tornado victims.
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Other Views: Still inspiring



