The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


September 20, 2012

Our View: Revisit after election

U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said it was pure politics that kept the Veterans Job Corps Act of 2012 from overcoming a Wednesday filibuster and get enough support to advance to a final vote.

And, she was most likely correct.

On the other side of the aisle, Tom Coburn, a Republican senator from Oklahoma, called the legislation a “political charade,” casting it as a way for Democrats and the president to get votes in the November election.

“What’s really happening here is we’re playing the political card because how could anyone oppose the Veterans Job Corps?” Coburn said.

“The better question is how callous it is to put forward a bill that we don’t know if it will work,” Coburn said.

He too has a point.

The legislation would have funded a proposal by President Barack Obama to create a veterans job corps, spending $1 billion on programs and grants to put former service members to work as police officers, emergency response personnel and park rangers.

Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt joined in with Coburn in voting “no.” Coburn said he thinks more time should be spent evaluating the six veteran job programs already in existence to see how effective they are before passing another.

According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the unemployment rate for veterans this year has hovered just below the national rate of around 8 percent. But finding jobs for younger veterans has been more difficult, with 10.9 percent of the veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan era unemployed last month.

While Wednesday’s vote ends the chance of passing the legislation before the November election, we would support a full study of the current job programs available for our veterans and the need for additional programs. We are certainly not against the Veterans Job Corps Act of 2012, but would like to see all sides of the issue given consideration.

Text Only
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon has vetoed legislation that sought to increase the tax credits available for donations to organizations providing food to the poor and aid to pregnant women, saying it would have eroded government funds needed for education and other services. Do you agree with the veto?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Argentina to Face Germany in World Cup Final Service Held for 200 Whose Bodies Went Unclaimed Kim Kardashian Hits Up Valentino Show in Paris "Hotwives" Spoofs Reality TV Israeli Offensive Escalates in Gaza Attack Dozens Gain Citizenship As Debate Continues Dodgers Found Partly Responsible in Fan Beating Children of Deported Parents Speak Out GOP: Immigration a 'human Rights Issue' Raw: 10-year Sentence for Ex-New Orleans Mayor Raw: Fans Gather for Argentina-Netherlands Match Froome Crashes Out on Bumpy 5th Tour Stage Obama Talks Economy, Slams Republicans Police: Prostitute Accused in Overdose Death Tornadoes Kill Four in Central New York McCaskill: Campus Assault Survey Is Wake Up Call Raw: Obama Shoots Pool in Denver Typhoon Nears Japan's Main Islands Day After: Brazil Reeling in WC Loss Weaver Reprises Ripley Role for 'Alien' Game