U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said it was pure politics that kept the Veterans Job Corps Act of 2012 from overcoming a Wednesday filibuster and get enough support to advance to a final vote.
And, she was most likely correct.
On the other side of the aisle, Tom Coburn, a Republican senator from Oklahoma, called the legislation a “political charade,” casting it as a way for Democrats and the president to get votes in the November election.
“What’s really happening here is we’re playing the political card because how could anyone oppose the Veterans Job Corps?” Coburn said.
“The better question is how callous it is to put forward a bill that we don’t know if it will work,” Coburn said.
He too has a point.
The legislation would have funded a proposal by President Barack Obama to create a veterans job corps, spending $1 billion on programs and grants to put former service members to work as police officers, emergency response personnel and park rangers.
Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt joined in with Coburn in voting “no.” Coburn said he thinks more time should be spent evaluating the six veteran job programs already in existence to see how effective they are before passing another.
According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the unemployment rate for veterans this year has hovered just below the national rate of around 8 percent. But finding jobs for younger veterans has been more difficult, with 10.9 percent of the veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan era unemployed last month.
While Wednesday’s vote ends the chance of passing the legislation before the November election, we would support a full study of the current job programs available for our veterans and the need for additional programs. We are certainly not against the Veterans Job Corps Act of 2012, but would like to see all sides of the issue given consideration.
Opinion
Our View: Revisit after election
- Opinion
-
-
Other Views: Still inspiring
Cutbacks in the military budget and the still-recovering economy mean this Memorial Day weekend will go down as a relatively subdued affair — relative, that is, to our usual end-of-school, official-start-of-summer blowout.
-
Our View: Setting standard
The sight of hundreds of young student volunteers walking across Moore’s Fourth Street interstate overpass had to be uplifting to the city’s tornado victims.
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Other Views: Still inspiring



