Why hasn’t this issue come up before?
The inquiry is: “Show me evidence that the massive infrastructure spending supports our mission in Afghanistan.” The inquiry was by Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., of the Show-Me State.
McCaskill is a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. It was during a committee hearing that she made that statement, and demanded that our top military leaders show evidence that “long-term, large-scale infrastructure projects in Afghanistan have contributed to our mission in that country.”
McCaskill asked for an analysis of how this large-scale infrastructure spending contributed to the success of our counterinsurgency efforts. She said billions of our dollars have been spent on these projects. She said if mistakes aren’t corrected now, “there will be a tendency in the next conflict to engage in these large projects.” McCaskill has been one of the most aggressive advocates of accountability in spending in our war efforts. Progress has been slow, but finally McCaskill’s efforts are beginning to draw attention.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel promised Sen. McCaskill that an analysis would be forthcoming and added that her remarks on accountability ... “are appropriate.”
It is sickening that we are spending billions of dollars in Afghanistan, and before that in Iraq, for infrastructure improvements to win friends in those countries. Yes, they may have been needed, but what about needs in our country? Our infrastructure in many states is in a poor state of repair, and we have to wait years for projects to be undertaken. Americans are growing tired of seeing projects in foreign lands being funded by our tax dollars while we have to wait, and wait, for improvements.
There is a strong doubt in the minds of many of us that this spending in Iraq and Afghanistan has contributed in a major way in our missions in those countries. We understand that it is difficult to ascertain the results. But we do know that what we have done, and are doing, is underappreciated. Some friends can be made by improving the infrastructure in those countries, but winning over a majority of the people isn’t going to happen. Many of the tribes could care less if we build roads, bridges and other infrastructure, from what we’ve read and heard.
It’s time to come home with infrastructure projects. We hope Sen. McCaskill keeps firing away at waste in our spending and the lack of accountability in what we are doing, not only overseas but at home also. It’s time to tend to America’s needs.
The Washington Missourian
Why hasn’t this issue come up before?
Our View: No need for No. 9
“Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”
Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong
On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.
Your View: No on Amendment 7
The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.
Your View: Bad way to get revenue
I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.
Other Views: Symptom of bad policy
The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.
Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'
Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.
Your View; Makes no sense
Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.
Your View: Time value of money
I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”
Your View: Boiling a frog
We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”
Our view: 'Yes' on 7
Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”
- More Opinion Headlines
- Our View: No need for No. 9