The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 10, 2014

Your View: Questions worth asking

PARSONS, Kan. — On Nov. 5, 2009, a mass murder took place at Fort Hood in Texas. A U.S. Army major and psychiatrist killed 13 people and wounded at least 30 others.

It was the worst shooting to have ever taken place on an American military base. Almost five years later, on April 2, 2014, Fort Hood suffered another tragedy. A U.S. Army specialist and Iraq war veteran reportedly killed at least three people and wounded some 16 others.

Both of these events were indescribable horrors. No words can do justice to the pain and suffering experienced by the victims, the victims’ families and the many others affected.

As is typically the case, many of our politicians and news media have quickly moved (or diverted) our attention to why the shooter did such a horrific thing. Not that the reason why someone would commit such atrocities doesn’t matter — it certainly does. But there are other important questions that deserve equal press and national attention. For example: Why do so many of our politicians, news media and members of the public continue to debate only whether the shooter’s actions were the result of madness or ideology, and how and where he obtained his weapon?

Why does there seem to be no anger, outrage or even a question as to why our military personnel and civilians are as defenseless as sitting ducks on a pond or as helpless as our children while at school?

Maybe what is long past due is a serious review of a related 21-year-old Department of Defense policy. This policy was originally approved by President Bill Clinton upon taking office in 1993 and left in place by President George W. Bush and (so far) by President Barack Obama. The regulations reportedly create “gun-free zones” on some military bases and forbid military personnel from carrying their personal firearms. This policy removed the right of self-defense from our military men and women — the same people we put in harm’s way to protect us and others. We trust them to risk life and limb on our behalf but not to routinely carry a weapon on a military base? What a way to say, “Thank you for your service.”

We all want to be safe and do not fault the intentions of those sincerely trying to make us so. But another question worth asking is “Why do we continue to have so much difficulty accepting that gun-free zones, ‘no-concealed guns’ signs, traffic signs and no trespassing signs are only honored by those choosing to do so?”

William James Moore

Parsons, Kan.

Text Only
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

A new provision by the U.S. Department of Agriculture allows qualifying districts with high percentages of students on food assistance to allow all students to eat free breakfasts and lunches. Would you agree with this provision?

     View Results
NDN Video
Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Palestinians and Israeli Soldiers Clash Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kerry: No Deal Yet on 7-Day Gaza Truce Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Gaza Residents Mourn Dead Amid Airstrikes Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp Cumberbatch Brings 'Penguins' to Comic-Con Raw: Air Algerie Crash Site in Mali Power to Be Restored After Wash. Wildfire Crashed Air Algerie Plane Found in Mali Israel Mulls Ceasefire Amid Gaza Offensive