The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

March 21, 2013

Pam Buttram, guest columnist: Resist being treated as special interest

ORONOGO, Mo. — Our U.S. Constitution provides that any powers not expressly given to the federal government are reserved to the states. Criminal law is one of those areas reserved to the states; things like theft, murder and domestic violence.

When Congress enacts criminal laws, it does so pursuant to express constitutional powers, for example, the power to regulate interstate commerce. For the most part, however, crimes we commit against each other are defined, enforced and punished at the state level.

Imagine having to call a huge federal bureaucracy for help when you hear someone breaking into your home in the dead of night. Do they even answer the phone? Think IRS. Not pretty, is it?

Many years ago I witnessed what happens when state and federal jurisdiction overlap. A father in a shaken-baby case was convicted and sentenced to life in prison under Oklahoma law. Because the father was Native American, the federal government also had jurisdiction and obtained in federal court a conviction and a sentence of 40 years. I never saw the point of the federal prosecution. Maybe it reassured the public. Maybe it gave federal attorneys something to do. But the father didn’t serve any more time and limited court resources were expended for no gain.

An expanded version of the Violence Against Women Act, first enacted in 1994, was recently signed into law. In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional the provision allowing women to sue in federal court; it violated states’ rights. The expanded version has even more constitutional problems. The act now includes emotional distress in the definition of domestic abuse. How the courts will interpret that is anyone’s guess, and how do you prove it or disprove it? Further, the act is expanded to allow non-Native Americans accused of domestic violence on tribal land to be prosecuted in tribal court, without a jury of their peers. The Heritage Foundation strongly opposed the act, stating that “men effectively lose their constitutional right to due process, presumption of innocence, equitable treatment under the law, the right to a fair trial and to confront one’s accusers, the right to bear arms, and all custody/visitation rights. It is unprecedented and dangerous.”

Concerned Women for America, the largest women’s organization in the country with 500,000 members, vigorously opposed the act, saying it “has morphed into a series of rigid and ineffective law enforcement programs that continue to spend approximately $400 million each year. The sad truth is that VAWA doesn’t seem to have made enough of a difference to justify the cost to taxpayers.” Indeed, a Department of Justice official admitted, “We have no evidence to date that VAWA has led to a decrease in the overall violence against women.”

We must be vigilant and insist upon accurate information about proposed laws, especially those with titles that appeal to us emotionally. Another misnamed law is the Affordable Care Act, which is hardly affordable when people are losing their insurance and their jobs because of it. The Government Accountability Office determined Obamacare will add $6.2 trillion to the long-term deficit, and the Congressional Budget Office estimates 800,000 jobs will be lost by 2021. Another craftily named bill to watch is the Employee Free Choice Act (Card Check). That bill does away with secret ballots in union organizing. Free choice? This bill increases pressure on workers to vote for the union against their will because everyone will know how they vote. And if the union and employer cannot come to agreement after 90 days, the bill allows the U.S. government to write the union contract. That’s a great incentive for unions to sabotage negotiations. Does it surprise you the bill is sponsored and written by labor unions?

Finally, I’d like to encourage all of us to resist efforts to treat us as special-interest groups. We are the United States so long as we are united. The proper role of the federal government is to defend the union. We are losing our way with all these proposed federal laws that pander to us as special interests. Let’s handle those concerns at the local level and insist that our federal government interact with us as a united people.

Pam Buttram lives in Oronogo.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Other Views Other Views: Eroding court’s authority

    While Kansans were focused on the twists and turns of school finance this past week, lawmakers made an unnecessary and historic change in how the state’s district courts operate, coercively tying the reforms to badly needed funding.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Travesty

    What a travesty that a terrific young man from Spain is on the verge of deportation even though he has proven his worth in America (Globe, April 13).

    April 18, 2014

  • Your View: Astonishing transformation

    The transformation of the Republican Party in the last decade is astonishing.

    April 18, 2014

  • Your View: The changing view

    It is heartbreaking to hear the decades old trees (which border on South Pennsylvania in Webb City) cracking and being bulldozed down.

    April 18, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Safe and sound

    Of the 7,500 Joplin and Duenweg homes hit by the 2011 EF-5 tornado, fewer than 20 percent of them had basements.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Funding for state’s roads

    Missouri is finding there is no good alternative to growing the economy, adding new well-paying jobs and expanding the tax base.

    April 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Government without apology or explanation

    Americans feel closest to their Uncle Sam at this time of year as he extends his hand for his “fair share” to fund his numerous endeavors.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Step aside

    The people of Joplin made it clear they wanted change at City Hall with their decisive votes to replace two council members.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Serious drawbacks

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) lays out clearly and persuasively the serious drawbacks with so-called right-to-work legislation.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Free choice

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) regarding right-to-work seems to assume that if workers are given the choice of joining a union, they won’t join.

    April 16, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

The United States is considering deploying about 150 soldiers for military exercises to begin in Poland and Estonia in the next few weeks, following Russia's buildup of forces near its border with Ukraine. Do you think we should deploy these troops?

Yes
No
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Raw: More Than 100,000 Gather for Easter Sunday Raw: Greeks Celebrate Easter With "Rocket War" Police Question Captain, Crew on Ferry Disaster Raw: Orthodox Christians Observe Easter Rite Ceremony Marks 19th Anniversary of OKC Bombing Raw: Four French Journalists Freed From Syria Raw: Massive 7.2 Earthquake Rocks Mexico Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest
Sports