The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

October 1, 2012

Elizabeth Kent, guest columnist: Breast cancer awareness sparks progress, prevention

JOPLIN, Mo. — Clearly, nothing is good about the fact that breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis in women. An estimated 227,000 American women will develop the disease in 2012. One fortunate outcome of this startling statistic, however, is the powerful community that has developed with one clear goal — to raise breast cancer awareness. This community, comprised of public and medical professionals alike, has become one of oncology’s success stories. It has raised both money and awareness, with the aim of eradicating a common disease.

It has been 30 years since Susan G. Komen for the Cure, one of the most well-known breast cancer advocacy groups, was established. In the decades since, October has become synonymous with breast cancer awareness, symbolized by the color pink. Thus, the reflective question arises: Have the goals of breast cancer awareness initiatives been achieved?

Although developed in the late 1960s, mammography did not become a standard screening tool until 1976. Even then it was not widely used. Throughout the 1980s, advocacy initiatives led to a dramatic rise in the use of routine screening mammograms. Today, an estimated 70 percent of American women undergo this all-important test. In addition, awareness of the importance of routine breast exams — both self-exams and those performed by medical professionals — has increased steadily. While these screening tools are not perfect, they have greatly affected the mortality of breast cancer.

Since 1990, the number of women dying from breast cancer nationally has decreased steadily. While some of this is because of more effective treatment, a substantial portion is because of early diagnosis. In terms of less-advanced cases — stage 0 through stage II — five-year survival rates are 75 to 95 percent; stage III through stage IV rates are 15 to 60 percent. For patients at Freeman Health System, from 1992 to 1996, only 48 percent of breast cancer diagnoses were stage 0 through stage II. From 2007 to 2010, a remarkable 80 percent of breast cancer diagnoses were Stage 0 through Stage II. These numbers mirror the national trends. While our ability to cure breast cancer at any stage is improving, there is absolutely no doubt that earlier diagnosis leads to higher potential for a cure. Breast cancer awareness initiatives have clearly helped to achieve this goal.

Where we are still missing our mark, both in medical and advocacy communities, is prevention. While mammograms and breast exams can detect cancer at an earlier stage, they cannot prevent breast cancer. Again, the “good” of breast cancer being so common is that research has been able to identify clear risk factors for the disease — several of which are modifiable. Well-established ways to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer include reducing body mass index, particularly after menopause; regular physical exercise, especially before menopause; minimizing alcohol intake; quitting tobacco use; and limiting hormone replacement therapy after menopause to four years or less, if at all.

Furthermore, several preventive medications are available for women at an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Tamoxifen and raloxifene decrease the risk of breast cancer by about 40 percent for those who are at greater risk. In a different class of drugs, exemestane decreases the risk by 60 percent. In general, these medications are safe and well-tolerated, although the decision to use them should involve an estimation of breast cancer risk based on a clinical evaluation and careful discussion with a provider accustomed to prescribing these medications.

Clearly, continued attention should be given to improving the quality of and access to routine screening. Hopefully, though, with increased awareness of how women can reduce risk, prevention will be the new success story of breast cancer awareness initiatives.

Dr. Elizabeth C. Kent is a medical oncologist and co-medical director at Freeman Cancer Institute.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: That's 'b,' as in bloated

    You can spin this two ways. Only about 2.5 percent of the money the federal government spends each year is spent on improper payments, such as overpayments to people receiving government benefits or tax credits for people who don’t qualify.

    July 11, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Time for special inquiry

    Testifying at a House committee hearing recently, Internal Revenue Services Commissioner John Koskinen did nothing to enlighten Congress or the public about a year-old scandal about whether his agency improperly targeted conservative groups.

    July 10, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Roundabout education

    With an influx of new roundabouts in Joplin, someone needs to promote education on how to drive through one. For instance, what yield means, stay in your lane, slow down, etc.

    July 10, 2014

  • Your View: How tragic

    “Governor vetoes 72-hour wait” was the headline on the front page of the July 3 Globe.

    July 10, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Restore the hall

    To borrow a phrase from a Home Depot commercial: “Let’s start doing.”

    July 9, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: It's like stepping into the Twilight Zone

    U.S. Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., was visiting the Fort Sill military complex in his home state and decided to visit the illegal immigrant processing center the federal government had recently opened on base.

    July 9, 2014

  • Your View: Who’s to blame?

    Not long ago, Mercy cut area jobs because our Republican legislators have refused Medicaid expansion.

    July 8, 2014

  • Your View: Access to health care

    On June 30, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against an Affordable Care Act requirement that employers cover certain contraceptive products at no extra charge, as part of preventive benefits in employee health insurance plans.

    July 8, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Who’s calling the shots?

    If Missouri Farmers Care really does care about the “Right to Farm” amendment on the Aug. 5 ballot, it sure has an odd way of showing it.

    July 8, 2014 1 Photo

  • Darvin Bentlage, guest columnist: Big ag dream wrong for Missouri farmers

    For centuries, we have had the right to farm. On Tuesday, Aug. 5, a proposed constitutional amendment will be on the state ballot that is supposed to give us protection so we can have the “Right to Farm.”

    July 7, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

A study, to be reported on in Sunday’s Globe, recently reviewed the market conditions across the region. Do you think this is a good time to start a business?

Yes.
No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Joy Fills Streets of Cleveland As LeBron Returns Proposed Bill to Regulate NY Costumed Characters WH: LeBron's Move a 'Powerful Statement' Ana Ortiz on 'Devious Maids' Finale CDC Addresses Lab Safety Problems Texas Shooting Suspect Collapses in Court Death Toll Tops 100 As Israel Offense Continues LeBron James Says He's Returning to Cavaliers Man Flees Police in World Cup Scalping Scheme Robot Writes Jewish Torah Scroll Raw: Israel, Gaza Exchange Rocket Fire More Immigrants Detained Along Rio Grande World Cup Final Pits Argentina Against Germany Police: Prostitute Linked to 2nd Death Thousands Attend NYC Firefighter's Funeral Art of Haitian Machete Fighting Revived Raw: Australia Hosts Annual Beer Can Regatta Mass. Mayor: Families Lost Everything in Fire Fans Dying to Be Near Jazz Greats Robots Gearing Up for Their Own 'World Cup'
Sports