Let’s see now, economic advantage, jobs infusion vs. one more stoplight on Range Line which is destined to be a difficult north/south pathway for many years to come. It is no longer the primary Highway 71 route and has become a commercial district. To my way of thinking commercial districts require stoplights to safeguard motorists and encourage continued interest by potential investors.
Granted, I’m not privy to your position regarding engineering, etc. which may not be easy. However it seems to me that sooner or later, Range Line will require more stoplights, or it will grind to a halt in terms of its economic contribution to the area. The practicality of the situation is that it will cost fewer dollars now that it ever will in the future.
Recent history includes the stoplight proposal at 17th and Range Line during the development of the property that includes Academy Sports. Since that stoplight was installed and the medians added there has been much development take place. The new Marketplace strip center was built and is occupied. AT&T; built a new storefront and others that were vacant are now occupied. Despite the early concern about the light making Range Line more difficult, it has been a stimulus to economic and property development.
I don’t see motorists avoiding Range Line because that stoplight made their life more difficult. I remember that project well as my brother was one of the two developers with that property. Short story, what was initially viewed by many as a negative quickly proved itself to be a positive on several levels.
It goes without saying, but I will say it anyway; I encourage you to take a viable, forward looking position on this issue and approve a stoplight to accommodate not only Hy-Vee, but promote peripheral development in that area of Range Line and Joplin. This is hardly a point in our economic history that it’s wise to take an obstructionist stance.
Suzanne Duncan
Joplin
Opinion
Voices: Stoplight stimulus
Editor’s note: The following letter was sent to officials at District 7 of the Missouri Department of Transportation.
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






