The fact that Congress will likely close out the year without reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act goes beyond “do-nothing.”
It’s just one more slap in the face to women who have already been abused. It also means that law enforcement officers, county prosecutors and others who receive funding for training in spousal abuse won’t be getting that support.
The measure also provides some funding for women’s shelters.
In Missouri alone, thousands of cases are heard each year involving domestic violence. From 2008 to 2011, the Missouri State Highway Patrol reported 153,549 acts of domestic violence.
Domestic violence and spousal abuse are big problems in this country, in this state and in our readership area.
The Violence Against Women Act has been re-authorized every year since its inception in 1994, and it has been done so without controversy.
The U.S. Senate earlier this year approved re-authorization of the act, but the U.S. House has not brought it to the floor. The holdup? Some Republican House leaders object to a tribal provision that would allow American Indian tribes to prosecute sexual-assault crimes on their land.
We fail to understand why some women should be protected while others are not. Stalling the re-authorization of this act is ludicrous.
At a time when victims of domestic violence need someone to stand strong for them, the leaders of this country have let them down.
We would urge you to write to members of the U.S. House of Representatives demanding some type of action. Kicking this can down the road puts too many lives at risk.
Opinion
Our View: Adding to the abuse
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



