—
The oaths have been taken, the speeches all given. Now President Barack Obama and the 113th Congress must decide how they will work together.
As envisioned by the Founders, “divided” government was not a horror to be feared, it was instead a best-case outcome to a worst-case scenario.
Knowing too well the danger posed to freedom and liberty from power concentrated in one centralized authority, the Founding Fathers drafted a Constitution spelling out in detail how to avoid such danger — three co-equal branches of government, each checking the power of the other. The framers of that great document were as wary of any new government as they were of the king they had just dispatched.
And while they recognized the need for a strong central government for trade, treaties and national defense, they also desired that same government be as limited as possible when it came to meddling in the affairs, dreams and the “pursuit of happiness” of those it governed.
Republicans in the House must do more than just obstruct, but President Obama must also realize that members of Congress have just as much a constitutional role as he. Calling them “hostage takers” may ring true to his political base, but Obama belies the truth of the very document he swore to uphold when he does.
But what many Americans don’t know today is that it is neither an obstinate House nor a recalcitrant president that is keeping the nation on its divided fence. It is one Harry Reid, D-Nev.
For over three years now, Reid has protected his Senate majority (and his own power) by refusing to pass a Senate budget bill and submitting it to the conference committee where the Founders intended the nation’s fiscal debates to occur.
Government of continuing resolution, by continuing resolution and for continuing resolution is no way to run any country, let alone one in such fiscal crisis as ours is today.
The partisan politics of today may not provide a way out of the budget mess we’re in today, but the Constitution does. If only Harry Reid would follow it.
Opinion
Our View: Blocking the path forward
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



