The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


February 8, 2013

Marta Mossburg, columnist: Give birth for your country’s sake

— I knew something was wrong with the United States when my closest college friends a year ago suggested only half jokingly that permits should be required to give birth. They were sick of subsidizing people to have babies who will only be a drain on resources, they said.

One said she supported a one-child-per-family rule. She and her husband chose not to have children to lighten the burden on a crowded earth, she said. I was pregnant with my third child at the time and another friend had her third sleeping in another room, so the conversation was uncomfortable. I felt, in fact, as if I was representing a mining company exploiting the Amazon at a Natural Resources Defense Council conference. But I pressed the matter because I could not comprehend how a group of educated women would consider adopting the policy of China, where millions of girls have been aborted, abandoned and murdered because of the law.

It was late, and we did not finish the discussion. But it turns out the U.S. faces a birth crisis, just not the one vexing my friends. American birth rates are plummeting. Pew Research Center late last year released data showing that births in 2011 were at the lowest level recorded, dropping 8 percent overall from 2007 to 2010. Births to immigrant women dropped 14 percent during the same time period and 23 percent for Mexican immigrant women, meaning the people most responsible for increasing U.S. population are no longer making up for American-born women’s declining fertility. Long story short, U.S. women are not having enough children to replace the population and the country is on the path to shrinking in generations to come.

This is going on around the globe, even in places like Brazil, which used to be a baby factory. And world population is slated to start declining in the next 50 years.

That’s good news to those who see each new child as a competitor for scarce resources.

But as Jonathan Last argues in his new book, “What to Expect When No One’s Expecting,” a falling population could spell economic disaster and make the world a more violent place.

Fewer births mean fewer workers to take care of America’s exploding elderly population, for example. He points out that the number of U.S. citizens over 65 will rise 72 percent between 2005 and 2025. This almost certainly means the government will spend less money on core services, more on entitlements and hike taxes — things already happening.

Last also notes research showing slower human progress since 1972 — right after fertility in the West started to implode.

On the flip side, countries with lower birth rates tend to be more peaceful. (However, they may also be more likely not to fight for any reason, because losing a child could mean wiping out the family.

That could give higher reproducing, more volatile countries the upper hand in conflict.) And it’s undeniable that fewer children make life easier and less expensive.

But ominously, he writes about how China’s one-child policy has led to a huge sex imbalance, with 123 boys born for every 100 girls. “The inevitable result of this is a large cohort of men who — as a matter of mathematics — cannot marry.” He adds, “a skewed sex ratio has often preceded intense violence and instability. So in addition to everything else, the Chinese will have a large cohort of military-aged, unmarried men — tens of millions of them — floating around at precisely the moment when the country is facing the burden of its uncared for elderly.”

One of the questions that we don’t yet know the answer to is how a society of people with no brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles will behave. Will they support the elderly? Will they attend religious services or serve in the military like Americans today? Or will they consider self-fulfillment their highest goal? On the face of it, family life will be diminished.

And if Last is right, the darker consequences will be the destruction of wealth, stability and, ultimately, happiness. So for the sake of America, let’s have more children.

Marta H. Mossburg writes frequently about national affairs and about politics in Maryland, where she lives. Write her at Follow her on Twitter at @mmossburg.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Lone holdout

    Missouri continues to be the only state in the United States that won’t allow a prescription drug database to be established.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years

    Does anyone recall the major economic argument during the 2000 presidential campaign between George Bush and Al Gore?

    July 22, 2014

  • Our View: Vote no on Amendment 1

    Proponents of Amendment 1 — the Right to Farm Act — have not made their case. We’ve met with advocates of this amendment to the Missouri constitution and listened to their arguments, but we don’t believe they have adequately answered the central question: Who is it protecting, and from what?

    July 13, 2014

  • Your View: Amendment 5 is deception of the highest order

    Amendment 5, sponsored by Missouri Sen. Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, “relating to the right of Missouri citizens to keep and bear arms” provides that “any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny.”

    July 21, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: No time to turn away

    With the shooting down of a commercial airliner over Ukraine and fighting that has now escalated to a ground war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, it would be easy for most U.S. citizens to throw up their hands and turn their backs.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Power to defend

    The Globe’s editorial ‘More guns not the answer’ (July 15) was saturated with classic progressive blather.

    July 21, 2014

  • Your View: Thanks for the generosity

    Generally, all we hear about is the bad news, and obviously, there is plenty available. Our church felt this event worthy of public knowledge.

    July 21, 2014

  • Your View: How to upgrade your business

    Let’s see now. When some folks wish to improve the exterior of their properties and have other taxpayers pay for the improvements, they create a community improvement district.

    July 21, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our view: Street smarts

    If your daily commute has been shortened because you no longer have to wait at 26th Street and Connecticut Avenue for a train to pass, thank your own tax dollars.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Decision fails test

    With the announcement that the State Board of Education has decided not to release individual school test results because of cyberattacks and other problems this spring, educators are scratching their heads, as are taxpayers who footed the bill.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Do you think Missouri should pass legislation that would allow a prescription drug database to be kept?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City Diplomatic Push Intensifies to End War in Gaza Obama Offers Condolences at Dutch Embassy Cat Fans Lap Up Feline Film Festival Raw: Lawmakers Scuffle in Ukraine's Parliament The Rock Finds His Inner 'Hercules' Michigan Plant's Goal: Flower and Die Raw: MH17 Passenger Remains in Kharkiv, Ukraine Raw: Israel Hits Gaza Targets, Destroys Mosques ShowBiz Minute: Hoffman, Oberst, Box Office WWII Vet Gets Medals, 70 Years Late Raw: Israel Bombs Multiple Targets in Gaza Veteran Creates Job During High Unemployment Raw: Cargo Craft Undocks From Space Station Widow: Jury Sent Big Tobacco a $23B Message New Orleans Plans to Recycle Cigarette Butts UN Security Council Calls for MH 17 Crash Probe Obama Bestows Medal of Honor on NH Veteran