The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


February 8, 2013

Marta Mossburg, columnist: Give birth for your country’s sake

— I knew something was wrong with the United States when my closest college friends a year ago suggested only half jokingly that permits should be required to give birth. They were sick of subsidizing people to have babies who will only be a drain on resources, they said.

One said she supported a one-child-per-family rule. She and her husband chose not to have children to lighten the burden on a crowded earth, she said. I was pregnant with my third child at the time and another friend had her third sleeping in another room, so the conversation was uncomfortable. I felt, in fact, as if I was representing a mining company exploiting the Amazon at a Natural Resources Defense Council conference. But I pressed the matter because I could not comprehend how a group of educated women would consider adopting the policy of China, where millions of girls have been aborted, abandoned and murdered because of the law.

It was late, and we did not finish the discussion. But it turns out the U.S. faces a birth crisis, just not the one vexing my friends. American birth rates are plummeting. Pew Research Center late last year released data showing that births in 2011 were at the lowest level recorded, dropping 8 percent overall from 2007 to 2010. Births to immigrant women dropped 14 percent during the same time period and 23 percent for Mexican immigrant women, meaning the people most responsible for increasing U.S. population are no longer making up for American-born women’s declining fertility. Long story short, U.S. women are not having enough children to replace the population and the country is on the path to shrinking in generations to come.

This is going on around the globe, even in places like Brazil, which used to be a baby factory. And world population is slated to start declining in the next 50 years.

That’s good news to those who see each new child as a competitor for scarce resources.

But as Jonathan Last argues in his new book, “What to Expect When No One’s Expecting,” a falling population could spell economic disaster and make the world a more violent place.

Fewer births mean fewer workers to take care of America’s exploding elderly population, for example. He points out that the number of U.S. citizens over 65 will rise 72 percent between 2005 and 2025. This almost certainly means the government will spend less money on core services, more on entitlements and hike taxes — things already happening.

Last also notes research showing slower human progress since 1972 — right after fertility in the West started to implode.

On the flip side, countries with lower birth rates tend to be more peaceful. (However, they may also be more likely not to fight for any reason, because losing a child could mean wiping out the family.

That could give higher reproducing, more volatile countries the upper hand in conflict.) And it’s undeniable that fewer children make life easier and less expensive.

But ominously, he writes about how China’s one-child policy has led to a huge sex imbalance, with 123 boys born for every 100 girls. “The inevitable result of this is a large cohort of men who — as a matter of mathematics — cannot marry.” He adds, “a skewed sex ratio has often preceded intense violence and instability. So in addition to everything else, the Chinese will have a large cohort of military-aged, unmarried men — tens of millions of them — floating around at precisely the moment when the country is facing the burden of its uncared for elderly.”

One of the questions that we don’t yet know the answer to is how a society of people with no brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles will behave. Will they support the elderly? Will they attend religious services or serve in the military like Americans today? Or will they consider self-fulfillment their highest goal? On the face of it, family life will be diminished.

And if Last is right, the darker consequences will be the destruction of wealth, stability and, ultimately, happiness. So for the sake of America, let’s have more children.

Marta H. Mossburg writes frequently about national affairs and about politics in Maryland, where she lives. Write her at Follow her on Twitter at @mmossburg.

Text Only
  • Other Views Other Views: Time for special inquiry

    Testifying at a House committee hearing recently, Internal Revenue Services Commissioner John Koskinen did nothing to enlighten Congress or the public about a year-old scandal about whether his agency improperly targeted conservative groups.

    July 10, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Roundabout education

    With an influx of new roundabouts in Joplin, someone needs to promote education on how to drive through one. For instance, what yield means, stay in your lane, slow down, etc.

    July 10, 2014

  • Your View: How tragic

    “Governor vetoes 72-hour wait” was the headline on the front page of the July 3 Globe.

    July 10, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Restore the hall

    To borrow a phrase from a Home Depot commercial: “Let’s start doing.”

    July 9, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: It's like stepping into the Twilight Zone

    U.S. Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., was visiting the Fort Sill military complex in his home state and decided to visit the illegal immigrant processing center the federal government had recently opened on base.

    July 9, 2014

  • Your View: Who’s to blame?

    Not long ago, Mercy cut area jobs because our Republican legislators have refused Medicaid expansion.

    July 8, 2014

  • Your View: Access to health care

    On June 30, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against an Affordable Care Act requirement that employers cover certain contraceptive products at no extra charge, as part of preventive benefits in employee health insurance plans.

    July 8, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Who’s calling the shots?

    If Missouri Farmers Care really does care about the “Right to Farm” amendment on the Aug. 5 ballot, it sure has an odd way of showing it.

    July 8, 2014 1 Photo

  • Darvin Bentlage, guest columnist: Big ag dream wrong for Missouri farmers

    For centuries, we have had the right to farm. On Tuesday, Aug. 5, a proposed constitutional amendment will be on the state ballot that is supposed to give us protection so we can have the “Right to Farm.”

    July 7, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Restrained ruling

    As most of the country was focused this past week on the Supreme Court ruling on whether Obamacare can force Hobby Lobby to provide contraceptive insurance coverage to its employees (it can’t), the high court released an opinion on another major case.

    July 7, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon has vetoed legislation that sought to increase the tax credits available for donations to organizations providing food to the poor and aid to pregnant women, saying it would have eroded government funds needed for education and other services. Do you agree with the veto?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Four Kids, Two Adults Shot Dead Near Houston Connecticut Boy Dies Inside Parked Car World's Tallest Water Slide: See It for Yourself Fans Dying to Be Near Jazz Greats Robots Gearing Up for Their Own 'World Cup' APNewsBreak: Different Attackers in Benghazi? Argentina to Face Germany in World Cup Final Service Held for 200 Whose Bodies Went Unclaimed Kim Kardashian Hits Up Valentino Show in Paris "Hotwives" Spoofs Reality TV Israeli Offensive Escalates in Gaza Attack Dozens Gain Citizenship As Debate Continues Dodgers Found Partly Responsible in Fan Beating Children of Deported Parents Speak Out Raw: 10-year Sentence for Ex-New Orleans Mayor Obama Talks Economy, Slams Republicans Police: Prostitute Accused in Overdose Death Raw: World's Tallest Water Slide Opens Thursday