The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


February 13, 2013

Our View: Line in the sand

— North Korea’s third underground nuclear test confirms that no matter what the rest of the world thinks, the country is developing nuclear weapons.

President Barack Obama has condemned the actions.

“The danger posed by North Korea’s threatening activities warrants further swift and credible action by the international community,” Obama said in a statement hours after the test. “The United States will also continue to take steps necessary to defend ourselves and our allies.”

But now comes the question “what next?” What more should be done to prevent North Korea from developing and manufacturing more nuclear weapons?

We have been having exactly the same conversation for about a decade over the same issue with Iran. All that has happened so far is seemingly a continuation of the development of nuclear weapons by Iran, but as of yet no testing of such weapons. What should we  do if Iran actually tests a nuclear device?

The objective of United States policy has long been to prevent the development and production of nuclear weapons by any nation. The strategy to implement that objective has been diplomacy and economic isolation of such nations attempting to gain nuclear weapons. But that strategy has failed for North Korea and perhaps will fail for Iran.

In our view, that leaves us with one option, the strategy of nuclear deterrence to prevent the use of nuclear weapons by any nation. Like it or not, it worked during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

For various reasons, the United States could not prevent the Soviet Union from gaining access to nuclear weapons or a few other nations, such as India and Pakistan, from doing so later on. Until policymakers can find a way to actually prevent the production of such weapons, we must keep nuclear deterrence firmly in hand as a primary policy to prevent the use of such weapons.

Text Only
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon said Tuesday that a tax cut approved by the Legislature could have a “cataclysmic” effect on state revenues to the tune of $4.8 billion. House Majority Leader John Diehl calls that “absurd.” Who do you believe?

A. Nixon
B. Diehl
     View Results
NDN Video
Bon Jovi Helps Open Low-income Housing in Philly Pipeline Opponents Protest on National Mall Hagel Gets Preview of New High-tech Projects S.C. Man Apologizes for Naked Walk in Wal-Mart New Country Music Hall of Fame Inductees Named 'Piles' of Bodies in South Sudan Slaughter New Yorkers Celebrate Cherry Blossom Blooms SCOTUS Hears Tv-over-Internet Case Justice Dept. Broadening Criteria for Clemency Chief Mate: Crew Told to Escape After Passengers 'Miss Meadows' Takes Holmes Back to Her Roots Biden: Russia Must Stop Talking, Start Acting David Moyes Out As Manchester United Manager Raw: Leopard Bites Man in India Iowa College Finds Beauty in Bulldogs High Court to Hear Dispute of TV Over Internet Stowaway Teen Forces Review of Airport Security