I hope the health care bill can be salvaged with the parts that actually do some good intact.
Is the bill perfect? No. Does it accomplish a few good things? Yes. Can it be improved by future smaller bills? Of course.
It is a beginning. I hope in the future some of these issues can be de-linked from each other and voted on as separate bills in a less contentious way. It almost seems like this bill was designed to give the GOP a big giant thing to oppose.
Well, conservatives opposed it, and for what? To look like they’re afraid of expanding Medicaid to meet medical inflation, or starting health insurance exchanges for those of us who aren’t fortunate enough to work for the federal government?
The GOP had plenty of chances to pass useful laws in this arena and did not. To cry that they need to be listened to now looks like sour grapes. The smart move on the right would be to own reform instead of playing to those who romanticize the 1800s and social Darwinism by opposing even moderate reforms.
A Republican who actually stood for giving American citizens in general the kind of freedom to choose from health insurance plans that federal employees get (a policy toward which this bill is a baby step) is the kind of Republican who could regain some credibility for himself, if not the party.
This bill is a giant stew of reforms, some only incremental, to substitute for actual radical change. And a little more radicalism would have actually sold better. In the future, I hope we find some modifications that will make this bill better, or add some new ideas that better help the American people. For now, why not at least get more citizens into the exchanges, or spend more money on building medical labs or training nurses? We can “compromise it to where you can vote for it” by making it serve the American people better.
Philip Wilson
Joplin
Opinion
Voices: Health bill worth saving
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
-
Our View: Meaningless in Missouri
Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






