—
A group of Kansas legislators want to extend the statute of limitations for prosecuting sexual assaults and rapes in that state by five years.
This is a good idea, although it may not go far enough.
Right now, the statute of limitations in Kansas is five years after the crime or five years after the victim’s 18th birthday.
Five years is a pretty narrow window, given the nature of the crime and the fact that a minor might have been a victim. Supporters of the bill note that victims often don’t report such crimes for years.
The bill would increase the statute of limitations to 10 years after the crime or 10 years from when the victim turns 18.
Rape victims, law enforcement officers and prosecutors all testified last week in favor of the bill, which is to get a hearing before the House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice this week. While there is no objection that we can think of to extending the statute of limitations, why not just eliminate it altogether?
About 20 states have no time limit for prosecuting rape, according to the Rape Abuse and Incest National Network, as reported in the Wichita Eagle.
“These victims deserve their day in court when the allegations can still be proven regardless of the delay,” said Ed Klumpp, who testified on behalf of the Kansas Association of Chiefs of Police, the Kansas Sheriffs Association and the Kansas Peace Officers Association.
We agree.
Take the 10, if that’s all that can be done now, but keep pushing toward the day when there is no longer a time limit.
Opinion
Our View: Good idea should go further
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



