JOPLIN, Mo. —
Based on the online reaction I followed among friends and peers, I got the sense everyone interpreted the massive and successful campaign to stop federal legislation aimed at protecting copyright as a victory for the little guy.
In fact, I think it was more a victory for one massive corporate behemoth (Google and the rest of the Internet-based tech community) over another corporate behemoth (Hollywood and old media).
I agree it was deeply flawed legislation, but it was one of the first steps toward figuring out how copyright will work in the Internet age -- something I think needs to be addressed if we want a future where artists get paid for their recorded output.
But while I think legal protections are important, I sincerely doubt if online piracy can be stopped without burning down the forest to save the trees. A coherent, sustainable business strategy for the music industry going forward is more important than new laws in Congress.
I think the real question everyone should be asking is how much music is worth.
The major labels are in free fall because they were built on an unsustainable business model of selling $20 plastic discs. Those kind of profits are never coming back, and the quicker both labels and artists accept that, the better.
The downside, for appreciators of spectacle such as myself, is we’ll likely never have artists as big as Michael Jackson or U2 again, and the entire mythology around the rags-to-opulence lifestyle of popular music will likely become a thing of the past.
On the bright side, the singles industry and independent music has flourished over the last decade even as overall albums sales and revenue have plummeted. Maybe with the right online price point, a balance between free-and-pay releases and a broader mix of revenue streams, such as commercial licensing, touring and merchandise, more artists then ever could earn a middle-class living making and playing music.
Free universal healthcare would help, too. It's hard to venture a career in the arts when one trip to the hospital means certain financial ruin.
Lana Del Rey
Last week I touched briefly upon Lana Del Rey and how the debate raging around her made me briefly consider ignoring new music all together. Well, with the release of her debut album “Born to Die” this week, that debate rages on, and I’ve resolved to not follow it too closely.
But I wanted to point out that in his review of the album in The New Yorker, Sasha Frere Jones nailed what’s so irritating about this particular discussion: Why is pop music the only art form that still inspires such arrantly stupid discussion?
The debates that surround authenticity have no relationship to popular music as it’s been practiced for more than a century. Artists write material, alone or with assistance, revise it and then present a final work created with the help of professionals who are trained for specific and relevant production tasks.
This makes popular music similar to film, television, visual art, books, dance and related areas such as food and fashion. And yet no movie review begins, “Meryl Streep, despite not being a Prime Minister, is reasonably convincing in ‘The Iron Lady.’”
Exactly. I doubt I’ll listen to “Born to Die” anytime soon, but as far as my everyday life, this sums up most of the arguments I find myself in with people when I defend the state of popular music as not being quite the apocalyptic wasteland these regular guardians of “good music” make it out to be.
That said, I can’t figure out who is upset about Lana Del Rey, born Lizzy Grant, for possibly having fake lips and inventing this self-styled persona of a “gangsta Nancy Sinatra”?
It is pointed out ad nauseum that this “in-authenticity” is a charge she can’t escape, and while I know there were a lot of anonymous comments and low-rent blog posts saying dumb things along these lines, I can’t find a venerable patient zero for the million think pieces responding to this criticism. I suppose if the Internet had been around 40 years ago more magazines would’ve responded to all the people outraged to find that Ziggy Stardust was really David Bowie who was really David Jones and that none of them knew any spiders from Mars.
Lifestyles
Related Photos
-
Jeremiah Tucker
Discussion
Jeremiah Tucker: SOPA raises real question of what music should be worth
- Lifestyles
-
-
Balloons become everything from giraffes to gateways in Joplin man's hands
Ronald Metz’s fingers fold pinched-off portions of a skinny, blue balloon, wrapping and squeezing them until the balloon ends up looking like a tail-wagging pooch.
-
Frankie Meyer: Tornado stories should be recorded
The Joplin tornado was one of the worst disasters to ever hit our area. Thousands of families were forever changed.
-
Cowboy church offers non-traditional Bible camp
Vacation Bible school gets under way in full force at Joplin area churches next month, but one congregation offers an alternative. How about Horsemanship and Bible camp?
-
David Yount: Christians still await return of Jesus
Unlike ourselves, the earliest Christians lived in imminent expectation of the consummation of history, when Jesus would return to usher in the kingdom of God. They thought heaven was right around the corner. This expectation explains their fervor.
-
Dave Woods: Branson attractions welcome Memorial Day visitors
People ask me the same question time and time again: How are folks in Branson?
-
Lee Duran: Aspiring authors must ‘be tough or be gone’
According to Chila Woychick, most readers will close a book and walk away at page 18. Could anything be more depressing?
-
Jeremiah Tucker: New charting methods help alternative music
Now the Hot 100 is using digital data such as iTunes downloads and plays on streaming sites such as Spotify, in addition to radio play, to determine a song’s ranking. This is likely a big reason why a song like “Somebody That I Used to Know,” which has benefited from high-profile exposure on TV, can be the No. 1 song in the country.
-
'Battleship' shows need for list of summer movie warnings
I like to think that writing these columns does more than just allow me a chance to offer up senseless opinions that are easy to skip over when trying to find the next show time for the latest “Madagascar.”
-
Joe Hadsall: Sherlock Holmes enjoying a renaissance
I was in the first grade when I read my first “Sherlock Holmes” book. It was a young readers edition of “The Hound of the Baskervilles.” Each left-hand page had 14- or 16-point text set in New Century Schoolbook; each right-hand page had a line illustration. One of those was a big, scary-looking dog.
-
Second Restore Fest to feature Jeremy Camp, Mandisa
Jeff Roman, partner relations director at Convoy of Hope, worked with Cox to return Christian recording artists to the stage in the second Restore Fest, which will take place Saturday in Landreth Park.
- More Lifestyles Headlines
-
