The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Lifestyles

February 15, 2013

Jeremiah Tucker: Grammys do little to reward modern music

JOPLIN, Mo. — There were a couple moments early on in the Grammy Awards show last Sunday that felt surprisingly indicative of the current state of popular music. None of them, unfortunately, involved Grammy voters recognizing and rewarding young, cutting-edge artists.

The first was when Kelly Clarkson, upon winning Best Pop Vocal Album, admitted that she didn't know who R&B singer Miguel is, but was (rightfully) wowed by his stunning performance of "Adore" moments earlier. Miguel, shoehorned into what felt like a consolation spot with zilch production values, except for the dubious assistance of rapper Wiz Khalifa, gave what was easily one of the night's best performances.

"Adore" was a sizeable hit for Miguel, and his album "Kaleidoscope Dream" debuted at No. 3 on the Billboard charts. Clarkson's ignorance of the young talent isn't necessarily evidence that the entire music industry, including what was once considered the mainstream, has fragmented into microsystems that compete for the attention of a dwindling audience.

Still, they are on the same record label.

The other moments included Prince just walking on the stage and Jay-Z clowning on The-Dream for his hat. Both earned responses from the live audience and on Twitter that rivaled any for the actual performances.

My guess why? Because Prince and Jay-Z are legitimate, honest-to-god stars -- the last of a dying breed -- and something the Grammys was sorely lacking.

Do we really want to live in a world where our biggest rock stars are called Mumford and Sons -- a bunch of unremarkable-looking British guys pretending to be a Depression-era jug band?

These are our rock stars? They make Coldplay look like "Appetite for Destruction"-era Guns N' Roses by comparison. Not that I actively dislike M&S -- they're better, at least, than the Lumineers.

I believe popular music is a wide river with ample room for small eddies, such as this current one we're experiencing where old-timey music made by anthropomorphic beards and suspenders rules the charts. Just don't be surprised if, in 10 years, Mumford is as influential as fellow Grammy Album of the Year winner Christopher Cross.

I don't expect the Grammys, of course, to act as a kingmaker, charting or even accurately predicting the future of music. But is it too much to ask that we reward some music that sounds as if it were created in the past 25 years?

And if the Grammys are going to ignore innovation, as they habitually do -- criminally underrepresenting rap and electronic music in the major award categories -- a graver mistake, at least from a self-preservation standpoint, is ignoring personality.

Where are the weirdoes? The iconoclasts?

The other big winners of the night were Fun (or fun.), an indie-rock band that made the lucrative decision to focus on ready-made radio anthems, and Australian singer-songwriter Gotye, who had the out-of-leftfield hit "Somebody That I Used to Know." All of them seem like nice, humble guys, but whenever they were on stage I couldn't help wishing Kanye West had decided to attend.

Text Only
Lifestyles
Speaking of Gardens

Facebook
Poll

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Parade
Magazine

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter