The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Local News

April 1, 2013

Jasper County dispatching transfer completed

CARTHAGE, Mo. — Jasper County residents who call 911 with a law enforcement emergency now won’t be transferred before reaching someone to send help their way.

The Jasper County Emergency Services Board began dispatching for the Sheriff’s Department at 9 a.m. Monday.

Sheriff Randee Kaiser at midday Monday said the transition had gone well after the final telephone switch completed the transfer.

April Tarrant, executive director of the Jasper County 911 center, agreed.

She said there had been “some nerves” about the changeover, which is expected to increase call volume at the county 911 center by more than 60 percent.

But she said more than half the dispatchers on staff worked at the center earlier when it provided dispatching for the sheriff’s office until August 2010.

“A lot of them are familiar with it, and that’s what we’re here for,” she said.

The changeover took place three months after Kaiser took office. He and Tarrant said the two agencies had worked together to prepare for the shift.

At the dispatch center, Tarrant said, changes included modifying software to reflect all the sheriff’s officers and the zone coverage used by the agency.

“We also changed some procedures, and we discussed that with the sheriff’s office and police chiefs for all the other agencies we dispatch, because we wanted to make sure we were consistent for everyone,” she said. “And, everyone has been very cooperative.”

Dispatchers who worked for the sheriff’s office have been placed in other jobs in the department, Kaiser said. The office also will give the 911 center some furniture and other equipment purchased when the sheriff’s office resumed its own dispatching operations.

Kaiser said the shift was a priority for him because he believed it would result in faster, more efficient service for county residents. He said he particularly wanted to eliminate the delay that occurred when emergency calls went to the 911 center, then were transferred to the sheriff’s office. Before transferring a call, dispatchers at the center would gather basic information in case the call was disconnected, then sheriff’s dispatchers would have to get information when the call came to them.

“Now, the first person they talk to will be the person who sends help,” Kaiser said. “Fifteen seconds isn’t a long time, but if someone’s kicking in your door at 3 a.m., it’s a big deal.”

Tarrant said the center has been able to take on the added calls without increasing its staff, but it has modified schedules based on expected call volumes.

Other preparations were completed last week, after the sheriff’s office and the emergency services board worked out an agreement under which the county board will provide emergency and nonemergency dispatching for the sheriff’s office at no charge.

Offering the service without charge had been a priority for the current 911 board, whose members pointed out that county taxpayers already were paying taxes for the 911 center.

An earlier 911 board charged the sheriff’s office $110,000 per year for dispatching when, in 2004, then-Sheriff Archie Dunn decided to contract for the service rather than replace outdated dispatching equipment. He decided to take back the sheriff’s dispatching operation after county voters in 2005 approved a quarter-cent law enforcement sales tax and after some disputes between him and the board could not be resolved.

Dunn was making plans to take back dispatching at the same time the board dismissed Rich Nordell, the former director, and hired Tarrant for the job in 2010.

“We’ve been able to meet with sheriff’s supervisors and discuss some things that had been issues before, Tarrant said. “It’s been a benefit.”

Sheriff’s emergency and nonemergency calls will go to the 911 center, but nonemergency calls will be automatically directed via a phone tree, allowing people to ask for a deputy or to reach sheriff’s operations such as administration, investigations and the jail, Kaiser said.

“If someone needs a deputy on a nonemergency basis, all they have to do is call our regular numbers — 358-8177 or 624-1601 — then dial ‘1,’” Kaiser said.


THE JASPER COUNTY Emergency Services Board in January endorsed a proposal from Joplin police Chief Lane Roberts suggesting the consolidation of the Joplin and county dispatching centers into a single dispatching point. Roberts said the plan would save money and provide better emergency services. A committee representing the two entities is working on the proposal, said April Tarrant, executive director of the Jasper County 911 center.

Text Only
Local News
  • r073114rebuildjoplin3.jpg 30 volunteers a day would be a ‘game-changer’ for Rebuild Joplin

    Betty and Louis Wirick, both 79, say they are grateful to have survived the 2011 tornado as it tore down part of their home of 25 years on South Bird Avenue. But three years later, they are frustrated.

    July 31, 2014 2 Photos

  • Event for veterans on tap at Crowder

    For area veterans who have returned home from more than a decade at war, the Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks hopes to send a simple message at an event this weekend: Welcome home.

    August 1, 2014

  • Fair to feature goats, chickens and decorated bras

    Along with the usual fair sights, sounds and smells — livestock, poultry, produce and the like — there will be something a bit unusual at the Cherokee County American Legion Free Fair this year: Decorated brassieres. And pink. Lots of pink.

    August 1, 2014

  • Damien D Doxley 051314.jpg Prison term meted out in carjacking case

    A Newton County judge assessed a defendant in a Joplin carjacking case seven years in prison Friday on a conviction on a charge of tampering with a motor vehicle.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • 080114 Older worker1_72.jpg Co-workers, friends honor nurse with 50-year career

    Wilma Massey has worked a half century in health care and, even at the age of 74, she’s the first to arrive at work each morning.

    August 1, 2014 2 Photos

  • Amendment 7 backers tout safety, new jobs; foes say special interests to benefit

    Billions of dollars are on the line when Missouri voters head to the polls on Tuesday to consider Amendment 7.
    The constitutional amendment, sent to the voters by the Legislature this year, would temporarily increase Missouri’s sales tax by three-quarters of 1 percent, raising an estimated $5.4 billion for the next decade to fund transportation projects. That includes more than $114.1 million in state funds for projects in Newton and Jasper counties, on top of additional revenue for localities that would be raised.
    After the Missouri Department of Transportation downsized in recent years, these projects are now mostly designed and built by private engineers, contractors and laborers — many of whom have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to a campaign effort to sway voters to support the measure.
    Last Monday — eight days ahead of the primary election day — supporters of the measure reported having raised more than $4.1 million for a campaign committee called Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs, which was established last fall to support the measure.
    The International Union of Operating Engineers in St. Louis and Kansas City have contributed nearly $250,000 to the effort. That total was dwarfed by the $649,398 put in by the Industry Advancement Fund Heavy Constructors. Between its Missouri and Kansas companies, APAC — a construction contracting company that specializes in transportation projects — has contributed more than $150,000.
    “The whole idea that money is flowing into the campaign, of course it is,” said Sen. John Lamping, a St. Louis Republican who is opposed to the measure. “It would be a smart business decision to do that.”
    Lamping said the money pouring into the campaign supporting Amendment 7 is indicative of the financial gain the measure bodes for contractors and laborers.  
    Lamping proposed a measure in the Legislature that would redirect one-eighth of existing sales and use tax revenue directly to transportation projects, but he said that measure was rejected by legislative leaders. The coalition “didn’t hear about it,” the outgoing senator said, “because it was my idea instead of someone else’s idea.”
    Lamping, who filibustered a similar measure in 2013, said Republicans have an ideological consistency problem on the issue. He pointed to the Legislature passing a sales tax increase only a few weeks after overriding Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of an income tax cut that will largely help businesses organized as limited liability corporations, like many of the companies that could benefit from the measure. Lamping said that the tax increase will mostly affect taxpayers who did not get a significant tax cut.
    “Who wants a tax cut in Missouri?” he said. “Businesses. (Republican leaders) wanted to make them happy and then they passed a tax cut. This is grand-scale special interest cronyism.”
    The ad campaign being funded mostly by the business interests features paramedics and construction workers claiming the measure would “fix our roads and keep Missouri families safe.”
    “We have a chance to give our highways and bridges the repairs they need,” says one ad, which is running in Joplin and statewide in the lead up to Tuesday’s vote. “We have a chance to fix what’s broken by voting yes on Amendment 7.”
    The commercial uses a lot of words to talk about the benefits of the measure, but two words in particular are noticeably absent from the commercial: “Tax increase.”  
    “The ads don’t mention any of the ballot language,” said Jewell Patek, a spokesman for Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs. “We figure Missourians will see the language when they go to the polls.”
    Patek, a former state representative who now lobbies the Legislature, said he disagreed with Lamping’s notion that Amendment 7 is all about special interest gain.
    “There’s quite a bit to gain for Missourians,” he said. “We have serious road needs. We’ll win or lose by the benefits in Amendment 7. I’m not sure I agree with Senator Lamping’s assessment.”
    If approved, Amendment 7 would prevent an increase in the state’s fuel tax, a funding boost opponents of the amendment like Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon and some of the state’s social welfare groups have said would be more appropriate because it could pull in revenue from people who use the roads — like the state’s trucking industry.
    The Missouri Truckers Association’s political action committee has contributed more than $27,000 to the effort to pass the measure. Tom Crawford, president of the association, said his members support the amendment because they see the problems on the road and deal with them every day. And passage of the measure does not mean anyone will stop paying fuel tax.
    “We overpay our fair share on the fuel tax,” he said, pointing to statistics by the American Transportation Research Institute that show truckers have accounted for about 14 percent of road usage while paying for 39 percent of all taxes and fees owed by motorists. “We pay sales taxes just like everybody does on goods and products that people buy in the stores.”
    Crawford said truck companies do not pay state sales taxes on the purchase of trucks, but they do pay a federal tax. “So, we won’t be impacted on new equipment purchase, but other areas of our business will be impacted just like every other taxpayer in the state will,” he said.
    Thomas Shrout, who is helping lead the campaign against the tax hike, said that is not good enough and that Amendment 7 lets truck drivers off the hook. “Under Amendment 7, they wouldn’t have to pay any more,” he said.
    Shrout’s opposition campaign has raised just over $27,000 — less than 1 percent of the total money raised by its supporters. They are targeting their opposition at the state’s urban core by spending money on direct mail and targeted robocalls in the final week.
    “We think using the sales tax to fund road projects is poor policy for the state of Missouri,” he said. “It should be rejected.”
    Shrout said the Missouri Department of Transportation and its supporters should go back to the drawing board and consider some of the other options like campaigning for toll roads or a gas tax increase — both based on road usage.
    Representatives for APAC and the Heavy Constructors Association declined requests for comment.

    Tuesday’s election
    Amendment 7 is one of five measures voters will consider when they head to the polls on Tuesday. Statewide, local election officials reported to the Missouri secretary of state that it was their estimate that about 27 percent of the state’s 4.06 million registered voters will show up to vote, including 25 percent of registered voters in Jasper County and 30 percent in Newton County.

    August 1, 2014

  • Brownback names 3 Kansas Board of Regents members

    Gov. Sam Brownback on Friday named a former veteran Kansas House member and two attorneys to the board overseeing the state’s higher education system.

    August 1, 2014

  • Grant to fund solar energy system for PSU’s Plaster Center

    An $80,000 grant from Westar Energy will fund solar panels to provide both energy and education at the Robert W. Plaster Center, now under construction at Pittsburg State University.

    August 1, 2014

  • Survey seeks views on Joplin’s future goals

    Residents are being asked to fill out a survey on priorities for Joplin’s future. The effort was inspired by a meeting of community leaders last month. Survey forms are available at the Joplin Public Library and online at

    July 31, 2014

  • Habitat slates volunteer work days

    In the wake of the 2011 tornado, Joplin Area Habitat for Humanity has been a partner with organizations and individuals in the construction of 86 new houses. But what’s also needed, Executive Director Scott Clayton said, are repairs to area homes.

    July 31, 2014

Must Read


Do you plan on voting in the Aug. 5 elections being held in Missouri and Kansas?

     View Results
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter